HEIR OF LATE DAXAISHBHAI JAYENDRABHAI BORKHATARIYA(Legal Heir) vs State of Gujarat Advocate - M K GOHEL — 34/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 33.1. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 15th April 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJGS010003422026
Filing Number
34/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
34/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEIR OF LATE DAXAISHBHAI JAYENDRABHAI BORKHATARIYA(Legal Heir)
Adv. I A SAMA1.
-
2.MANISHABEN JAYENDRABHAI BORKHATARIYA
Adv. I A SAMA1.
-
3.PARTH JAYENDRABHAI BORKHATARIYA
Adv. I A SAMA1.
-
4.MILAN JAYENDRABHAI BORKHATARIYA
Adv. I A SAMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Gujarat Advocate - M K GOHEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Judegement
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the legal heirs of Daxeshbhai Jayendrabhai Borkhatariya's application to sue as indigent persons under Order-33, Rule-1 of the Civil Procedure Code. The tribunal found satisfactory evidence that the applicants lacked sufficient means to pay requisite court fees for their compensation claim. The applicants are permitted to file their motor accident compensation petition in forma pauperism, with court fees to be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on any decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
03-Apr-2026
Service Of Process
Principal District Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Service Of Process
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 34/2026
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the legal heirs of Daxeshbhai Jayendrabhai Borkhatariya's application to sue as indigent persons under Order-33, Rule-1 of the Civil Procedure Code. The tribunal found satisfactory evidence that the applicants lacked sufficient means to pay requisite court fees for their compensation claim. The applicants are permitted to file their motor accident compensation petition in forma pauperism, with court fees to be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on any decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts