IMTIYAZBHAI URFE RIYAN ARIFBHAI PATANI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 115/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJGS010003352026
Filing Number
115/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
115/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186006260158
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
IMTIYAZBHAI URFE RIYAN ARIFBHAI PATANI
Adv. S S PANJA
Respondent(s)
State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
ORIGINAL COMPLENANT
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
HEARING
SERVICE OF PROCESS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 10-03-2026 | SERVICE OF PROCESS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 115/2026 The court granted bail to the accused, Imtiyazbhai Urfe Riyan Arifbhai Patani, under BNSS Section 483. The accused was charged with offenses under IPC Sections 75, 78, and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012 (Sections 12, 18) and Atrocity Act (Sections 3(1)(w), 3(2)(p)). The court found that while a consensual relationship existed between the accused and the minor (17 years 4 months old), no evidence on record demonstrated coercion or unlawful acts against the victim's will. The complainant (victim's mother) failed to appear, and crucial investigative records were incomplete. Accordingly, the court released the accused on bail of ₹15,000 with conditions including regular court appearance and prohibition from leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 115/2026 The court granted bail to the accused, Imtiyazbhai Urfe Riyan Arifbhai Patani, under BNSS Section 483. The accused was charged with offenses under IPC Sections 75, 78, and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012 (Sections 12, 18) and Atrocity Act (Sections 3(1)(w), 3(2)(p)). The court found that while a consensual relationship existed between the accused and the minor (17 years 4 months old), no evidence on record demonstrated coercion or unlawful acts against the victim's will. The complainant (victim's mother) failed to appear, and crucial investigative records were incomplete. Accordingly, the court released the accused on bail of ₹15,000 with conditions including regular court appearance and prohibition from leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts