LALJIBHAI KALUBHAI PARMAR vs State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 114/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJGS010003322026

Filing Number

114/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

114/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186001260090

Police Station

GIR GADHADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(C),20(B)(2)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LALJIBHAI KALUBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. A M PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Court, Gir Somnath rejected petitioner Laljibhai Kalubhai Parmar's bail application under BNSS Section 483 in a narcotic drugs case. The court found that 11.936 kg of cannabis plants were seized from land under the petitioner's possession, and rejected arguments about procedural violations in the seizure and investigation, determining the recovery itself was sufficient to warrant continued detention pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 114/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court, Gir Somnath rejected petitioner Laljibhai Kalubhai Parmar's bail application under BNSS Section 483 in a narcotic drugs case. The court found that 11.936 kg of cannabis plants were seized from land under the petitioner's possession, and rejected arguments about procedural violations in the seizure and investigation, determining the recovery itself was sufficient to warrant continued detention pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case