DIPAKBHAI JIVRAJBHAI PARMAR vs PRO. OF ARJUN MANGO SUPPLYERS RAMESHKUMAR VITHALBHAI JARSARNIYA — 110/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 09th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJGS010003132026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

110/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

110/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

LIMITATION ACT, 1963 Section 5,
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

DIPAKBHAI JIVRAJBHAI PARMAR

Adv. D M VYAS

Respondent(s)

PRO. OF ARJUN MANGO SUPPLYERS RAMESHKUMAR VITHALBHAI JARSARNIYA

State of Gujarat

Adv. K D VALA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

SERVICE OF PROCESS

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Sessions Court of Gir Somnath granted the appellant's application to condone an 84-day delay in filing a criminal appeal under the Limitation Act. The court found that the appellant was not present when the trial court's conviction order was pronounced, thus could not have known of the judgment immediately, and there was no other cause for the delay. Applying the principle established in the Supreme Court's decision in Collector of Land Acquisition v. Master Katiji, the court allowed the delayed appeal to be filed in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court of Gir Somnath granted the appellant's application to condone an 84-day delay in filing a criminal appeal under the Limitation Act. The court found that the appellant was not present when the trial court's conviction order was pronounced, thus could not have known of the judgment immediately, and there was no other cause for the delay. Applying the principle established in the Supreme Court's decision in Collector of Land Acquisition v. Master Katiji, the court allowed the delayed appeal to be filed in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case