DIPAKBHAI JIVRAJBHAI PARMAR vs PRO. OF ARJUN MANGO SUPPLYERS RAMESHKUMAR VITHALBHAI JARSARNIYA — 110/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJGS010003132026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
110/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
110/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIPAKBHAI JIVRAJBHAI PARMAR
Adv. D M VYAS
Respondent(s)
PRO. OF ARJUN MANGO SUPPLYERS RAMESHKUMAR VITHALBHAI JARSARNIYA
State of Gujarat
Adv. K D VALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
SERVICE OF PROCESS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | SERVICE OF PROCESS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Court of Gir Somnath granted the appellant's application to condone an 84-day delay in filing a criminal appeal under the Limitation Act. The court found that the appellant was not present when the trial court's conviction order was pronounced, thus could not have known of the judgment immediately, and there was no other cause for the delay. Applying the principle established in the Supreme Court's decision in Collector of Land Acquisition v. Master Katiji, the court allowed the delayed appeal to be filed in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Court of Gir Somnath granted the appellant's application to condone an 84-day delay in filing a criminal appeal under the Limitation Act. The court found that the appellant was not present when the trial court's conviction order was pronounced, thus could not have known of the judgment immediately, and there was no other cause for the delay. Applying the principle established in the Supreme Court's decision in Collector of Land Acquisition v. Master Katiji, the court allowed the delayed appeal to be filed in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts