ATULBHAI PRAVINBHAI DHAKAN vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 109/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJGS010003122026
Filing Number
109/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
109/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
2-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ATULBHAI PRAVINBHAI DHAKAN
Adv. M P DHOLIYA
-
2.BHARATBHAI PRAVINBHAI SONI
Adv. M P DHOLIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Additional Sessions Court in Veraval (Gujarat) rejected the bail application filed by two accused persons (Atulbhai Pravinbhai Dhakar and Bhratbhai Pravinbhai Soni) under Section 483 of the BNSS. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused committed theft of gold ornaments worth approximately ₹1,10,000 from an Ambé Mata temple in Gorakhmadi village, with the stolen items recovered from their possession and identified by the complainant. The court denied bail, concluding the accused were habitual offenders likely to commit further crimes if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
Addl. District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 109/2026
Summary: The Additional Sessions Court in Veraval (Gujarat) rejected the bail application filed by two accused persons (Atulbhai Pravinbhai Dhakar and Bhratbhai Pravinbhai Soni) under Section 483 of the BNSS. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused committed theft of gold ornaments worth approximately ₹1,10,000 from an Ambé Mata temple in Gorakhmadi village, with the stolen items recovered from their possession and identified by the complainant. The court denied bail, concluding the accused were habitual offenders likely to commit further crimes if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts