ABDUL ISMAIL MUSANI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 108/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJGS010003112026

Filing Number

108/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

108/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 298,325
The Gujarat Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act, 2017 Section 5(1)(a),6(b),8(1)(2)(3)(4),10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL ISMAIL MUSANI

    Adv. A I SUMARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court at Veraval rejected the bail application of Abdul Ismail Musarni under BNSS Section 483. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 298, 325 and Animal Protection Act 1954 for involvement in bovine slaughter and meat trafficking. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused procured and facilitated distribution of beef, and granting bail would encourage such illegal activities and disturb public order, hence dismissed the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 108/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court at Veraval rejected the bail application of Abdul Ismail Musarni under BNSS Section 483. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 298, 325 and Animal Protection Act 1954 for involvement in bovine slaughter and meat trafficking. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused procured and facilitated distribution of beef, and granting bail would encourage such illegal activities and disturb public order, hence dismissed the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case