MUSTAKBHAI MAHAMADBHAI TAJVANI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 105/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJGS010003052026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

105/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

105/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186009260091

Police Station

VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 118(1),118(2),115(2),310(2),309(4),352,351(2),54,

Petitioner(s)

MUSTAKBHAI MAHAMADBHAI TAJVANI

Adv. J I SHELAT

Respondent(s)

State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

ORDER

07-03-2026

HEARING

05-03-2026

SERVICE OF PROCESS

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Gir Somnath Additional Sessions Court granted bail to the accused Mustakabhai Muhammadabhai under Section 483 of the BNSS, despite serious charges including rioting with deadly weapons, grievous injury, and armed theft. The court found that while prior criminal cases existed against the accused, these alone were insufficient grounds for bail denial, and the court imposed strict conditions including regular court appearance, maintaining residence details, and cooperating with investigation authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gir Somnath Additional Sessions Court granted bail to the accused Mustakabhai Muhammadabhai under Section 483 of the BNSS, despite serious charges including rioting with deadly weapons, grievous injury, and armed theft. The court found that while prior criminal cases existed against the accused, these alone were insufficient grounds for bail denial, and the court imposed strict conditions including regular court appearance, maintaining residence details, and cooperating with investigation authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case