TUSHAR URFE BOSS JAVIDBHAI CHAUHAN vs State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 102/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJGS010002972026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

102/2026

Filing Date

28-02-2026

Registration No

102/2026

Registration Date

28-02-2026

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 109(1),115(1),351(2),351(3),352,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135
SCHEDULED CASTS AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF TROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va),

Petitioner(s)

TUSHAR URFE BOSS JAVIDBHAI CHAUHAN

Adv. D M CHOPDA

Respondent(s)

State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

09-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

HEARING

06-03-2026

HEARING

05-03-2026

HEARING

03-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Gir Somnath, granted bail to the accused Turshaar Urf Boss Javidabhai Chauhan under Section 483 of the BNSS. The court found that while the FIR alleged an assault involving multiple accused, the investigation was incomplete—the investigating officer failed to appear, no sworn statement was filed, and crucial evidence was not presented. Considering the accused is a local resident with community ties, the court approved bail on a bond of ₹15,000 with standard conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Gir Somnath, granted bail to the accused Turshaar Urf Boss Javidabhai Chauhan under Section 483 of the BNSS. The court found that while the FIR alleged an assault involving multiple accused, the investigation was incomplete—the investigating officer failed to appear, no sworn statement was filed, and crucial evidence was not presented. Considering the accused is a local resident with community ties, the court approved bail on a bond of ₹15,000 with standard conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case