TUSHAR URFE BOSS JAVIDBHAI CHAUHAN vs State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 102/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJGS010002972026
Filing Number
102/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
102/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
2-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TUSHAR URFE BOSS JAVIDBHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. D M CHOPDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Gir Somnath, granted bail to the accused Turshaar Urf Boss Javidabhai Chauhan under Section 483 of the BNSS. The court found that while the FIR alleged an assault involving multiple accused, the investigation was incomplete—the investigating officer failed to appear, no sworn statement was filed, and crucial evidence was not presented. Considering the accused is a local resident with community ties, the court approved bail on a bond of ₹15,000 with standard conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 102/2026
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Gir Somnath, granted bail to the accused Turshaar Urf Boss Javidabhai Chauhan under Section 483 of the BNSS. The court found that while the FIR alleged an assault involving multiple accused, the investigation was incomplete—the investigating officer failed to appear, no sworn statement was filed, and crucial evidence was not presented. Considering the accused is a local resident with community ties, the court approved bail on a bond of ₹15,000 with standard conditions including regular court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts