HEIR OF LATE MANJUBEN KISHANBHAI BAMANIYA(Legal Heir) vs State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 31/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 33.1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 03rd April 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJGS010002892026
Filing Number
31/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
31/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
2-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEIR OF LATE MANJUBEN KISHANBHAI BAMANIYA(Legal Heir)
Adv. T D PARMAR1.
-
2.KISHANBHAI ARJANBHAI BAMANIYA
Adv. T D PARMAR1.
-
3.BHUMIKABEN KISHANBHAI BAMANIYA
Adv. T D PARMAR1.
-
4.HIREN KISHANBHAI BAMANIYA
Adv. T D PARMAR1.
-
5.MINOR DHARMESH KISHANBHAI BAMANIYA
Adv. T D PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: MA-CMA No. 31/2026 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Veraval allowed the application of the heirs of deceased Manjuben Kishanbhai Bamaniya to sue as indigent persons under Order-33, Rule-1 of the Civil Procedure Code. The tribunal found satisfactory evidence that the applicants lacked sufficient means to pay court fees for their compensation claim. Court fees were ordered to be recovered after adjudication and will be the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Addl. District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 31/2026
Case Summary: MA-CMA No. 31/2026 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Veraval allowed the application of the heirs of deceased Manjuben Kishanbhai Bamaniya to sue as indigent persons under Order-33, Rule-1 of the Civil Procedure Code. The tribunal found satisfactory evidence that the applicants lacked sufficient means to pay court fees for their compensation claim. Court fees were ordered to be recovered after adjudication and will be the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts