RUBIYABEN FARIDBHAI BHESALIYA HEIRS OF LATE ANJUMAN FARIDBHAI BHESALIYA vs State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 25/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 33.1,33.2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJGS010001922026

Filing Number

25/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 33.1,33.2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUBIYABEN FARIDBHAI BHESALIYA HEIRS OF LATE ANJUMAN FARIDBHAI BHESALIYA

    Adv. K V BORICHANGER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Gir-Somnath allowed an application by Rubiyaben Faridbhai Bhesaliya, legal guardian of deceased Anjuman, to sue as an indigent person under Order-33, Rule-1 of the CPC. The court found that the applicant lacked sufficient means to pay requisite court fees and permitted her to file a motor accident compensation petition in forma pauperis, with court fees to be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Service Of Process

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Gir-Somnath allowed an application by Rubiyaben Faridbhai Bhesaliya, legal guardian of deceased Anjuman, to sue as an indigent person under Order-33, Rule-1 of the CPC. The court found that the applicant lacked sufficient means to pay requisite court fees and permitted her to file a motor accident compensation petition in forma pauperis, with court fees to be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case