AJAYBHAI DINESHBHAI PARMAR vs HINABEN W/O AJAYBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R A KANSAGARA — 8/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 440. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJGS010001852026

Filing Number

8/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 440

Petitioner(s)

1.AJAYBHAI DINESHBHAI PARMAR

Adv. R D MUCHHAL

Respondent(s)

1.HINABEN W/O AJAYBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R A KANSAGARA
2.NATUBHAI NATHABHAI CHAUHAN

Adv. R A KANSAGARA
3.HANSABEN NATUBHAI CHAUHAN
4.JAYDIP NATUBHAI CHAUHAN

Adv. R A KANSAGARA
5.AARTI W/O ARVIND PARMAR
6.State of Gujarat

Adv. K D VALA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
15-Apr-2026

JudegementView PDF

Court Decision Summary The High Court of Gujarat (Gir Somnath, Veraval) dismissed a husband's revision petition challenging a lower court's rejection of his request for a search warrant to recover his wife from her parents' custody. The court held that since the wife was residing with her own parents (not unlawfully detained), no prima facie criminal case under IPC Sections 100-101 existed, and absent clear illegality in the lower court's order, revision intervention was unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
15-Apr-2026

Disposed

Principal District Judge
09-Mar-2026

Final Arguments

Principal District Judge
12-Feb-2026

For R&P

Principal District Judge
09-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 8/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The High Court of Gujarat (Gir Somnath, Veraval) dismissed a husband's revision petition challenging a lower court's rejection of his request for a search warrant to recover his wife from her parents' custody. The court held that since the wife was residing with her own parents (not unlawfully detained), no prima facie criminal case under IPC Sections 100-101 existed, and absent clear illegality in the lower court's order, revision intervention was unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.