AJAYBHAI DINESHBHAI PARMAR vs HINABEN W/O AJAYBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R A KANSAGARA — 8/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 440,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 15th April 2026.

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJGS010001852026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

8/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

District Court, Veraval

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 440,

Petitioner(s)

AJAYBHAI DINESHBHAI PARMAR

Adv. R D MUCHHAL

Respondent(s)

HINABEN W/O AJAYBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R A KANSAGARA

NATUBHAI NATHABHAI CHAUHAN

Adv. R A KANSAGARA

HANSABEN NATUBHAI CHAUHAN

JAYDIP NATUBHAI CHAUHAN

Adv. R A KANSAGARA

AARTI W/O ARVIND PARMAR

State of Gujarat

Adv. K D VALA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

15-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

12-02-2026

FOR R&P

09-02-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The High Court of Gujarat (Gir Somnath, Veraval) dismissed a husband's revision petition challenging a lower court's rejection of his request for a search warrant to recover his wife from her parents' custody. The court held that since the wife was residing with her own parents (not unlawfully detained), no prima facie criminal case under IPC Sections 100-101 existed, and absent clear illegality in the lower court's order, revision intervention was unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The High Court of Gujarat (Gir Somnath, Veraval) dismissed a husband's revision petition challenging a lower court's rejection of his request for a search warrant to recover his wife from her parents' custody. The court held that since the wife was residing with her own parents (not unlawfully detained), no prima facie criminal case under IPC Sections 100-101 existed, and absent clear illegality in the lower court's order, revision intervention was unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case