GOVINDBHAI HAMIRBHAI CHAVADA vs AJITKUMAR RAJABHAI MARU Advocate - R M RAM — 11/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJGS010001552023
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
11/2023
Filing Date
24-02-2023
Registration No
11/2023
Registration Date
24-02-2023
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVINDBHAI HAMIRBHAI CHAVADA
Adv. M B KHANIYA
Respondent(s)
AJITKUMAR RAJABHAI MARU Advocate - R M RAM
ARASHIBHAI NAGABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. R M RAM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
HEARING
HEARING
OPPONENTS EVIDENCE
OPPONENTS EVIDENCE
OPPONENTS EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-04-2026 | OPPONENTS EVIDENCE |
| 10-04-2026 | OPPONENTS EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | OPPONENTS EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 11/2023 Outcome: The petitioner's claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was dismissed with costs. The court ruled that since the accident occurred on 19/11/2022, before the amended Motor Vehicles Act (2019) came into effect on 01/04/2022, the petitioner's claim under sections 140-144 is not legally maintainable and does not qualify for compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 11/2023 Outcome: The petitioner's claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was dismissed with costs. The court ruled that since the accident occurred on 19/11/2022, before the amended Motor Vehicles Act (2019) came into effect on 01/04/2022, the petitioner's claim under sections 140-144 is not legally maintainable and does not qualify for compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts