DABHI NIMESH KISHORJI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 63/2024
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.
TAPP LC - Application for Termination
CNR: GJGN060002502024
Next Hearing
03rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
63/2024
Filing Date
03-07-2024
Registration No
63/2024
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, KALOL
Judge
1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DABHI NIMESH KISHORJI
Adv. A N PATEL
Respondent(s)
THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 06-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 09-01-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 20-12-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 29-11-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Summary The Labour Court, Kalol dismissed an interim application (Application No. 63-2024) filed by an employee seeking interim relief (75% of monthly wages as subsistence allowance) pending the hearing of a main dispute under the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946, Section 119(D). The court held that interim relief cannot be granted at the pendency stage and rejected the employee's application on the grounds that such final-form relief is not permissible under the applicable legal provisions and precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Labour Court, Kalol dismissed an interim application (Application No. 63-2024) filed by an employee seeking interim relief (75% of monthly wages as subsistence allowance) pending the hearing of a main dispute under the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946, Section 119(D). The court held that interim relief cannot be granted at the pendency stage and rejected the employee's application on the grounds that such final-form relief is not permissible under the applicable legal provisions and precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts