GOHIL DINESH KARSHANBHAI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 49/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.
TAPP LC - Application for Termination
CNR: GJGN060002332024
Next Hearing
03rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
49/2024
Filing Date
03-07-2024
Registration No
49/2024
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, KALOL
Judge
1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOHIL DINESH KARSHANBHAI
Adv. A N PATEL
Respondent(s)
THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 06-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 09-01-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 20-12-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 15-11-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Summary The Labour Court (Kalol) dismissed the petitioner's interim application seeking 75% subsistence allowance during pending proceedings under Section 119(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1946. The court held that such interim relief cannot be granted while a case is pending, as it would prejudge the main case merits. The court found the termination order potentially flawed due to lack of proper inquiry, but deferred substantive relief to the final judgment stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Labour Court (Kalol) dismissed the petitioner's interim application seeking 75% subsistence allowance during pending proceedings under Section 119(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1946. The court held that such interim relief cannot be granted while a case is pending, as it would prejudge the main case merits. The court found the termination order potentially flawed due to lack of proper inquiry, but deferred substantive relief to the final judgment stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts