GOHIL DINESH KARSHANBHAI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 49/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.

For Evidence of Applicant Next hearing 03-Apr-2026 this date has passed

TAPP LC - Application for Termination

CNR: GJGN060002332024

Filing Number

49/2024

Filing Date

03-Jul-2024

Registration No

49/2024

Registration Date

03-Jul-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, KALOL

Judge

1-Judge Labour Court Kalol

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 79,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOHIL DINESH KARSHANBHAI

    Adv. A N PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA

Case History

  1. 03-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  5. 20-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  6. 15-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  7. 04-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  8. 02-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  9. 07-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  10. 15-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  11. 17-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  12. 27-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  13. 29-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 22-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 15-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Labour Court (Kalol) dismissed the petitioner's interim application seeking 75% subsistence allowance during pending proceedings under Section 119(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1946. The court held that such interim relief cannot be granted while a case is pending, as it would prejudge the main case merits. The court found the termination order potentially flawed due to lack of proper inquiry, but deferred substantive relief to the final judgment stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 15-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 15-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  18. 05-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  19. 15-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 11-Mar-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 27-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 11-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 01-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 04-Jan-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 21-Dec-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 22-Oct-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 05-Oct-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 03-Sep-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 06-Aug-2024

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 03-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 03-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 49/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Labour Court (Kalol) dismissed the petitioner's interim application seeking 75% subsistence allowance during pending proceedings under Section 119(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1946. The court held that such interim relief cannot be granted while a case is pending, as it would prejudge the main case merits. The court found the termination order potentially flawed due to lack of proper inquiry, but deferred substantive relief to the final judgment stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case