GOHIL DINESH KARSHANBHAI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 49/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.
TAPP LC - Application for Termination
CNR: GJGN060002332024
Filing Number
49/2024
Filing Date
03-Jul-2024
Registration No
49/2024
Registration Date
03-Jul-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, KALOL
Judge
1-Judge Labour Court Kalol
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOHIL DINESH KARSHANBHAI
Adv. A N PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA
Case History
-
03-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
06-Feb-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
09-Jan-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
20-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
15-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
04-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
02-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
07-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
15-Jul-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
17-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
27-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
29-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
22-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Apr-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary The Labour Court (Kalol) dismissed the petitioner's interim application seeking 75% subsistence allowance during pending proceedings under Section 119(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1946. The court held that such interim relief cannot be granted while a case is pending, as it would prejudge the main case merits. The court found the termination order potentially flawed due to lack of proper inquiry, but deferred substantive relief to the final judgment stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
11-Mar-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
27-Feb-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
11-Feb-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Feb-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
04-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Dec-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
22-Oct-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Oct-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Sep-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-Aug-2024
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 49/2024
Summary The Labour Court (Kalol) dismissed the petitioner's interim application seeking 75% subsistence allowance during pending proceedings under Section 119(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1946. The court held that such interim relief cannot be granted while a case is pending, as it would prejudge the main case merits. The court found the termination order potentially flawed due to lack of proper inquiry, but deferred substantive relief to the final judgment stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts