PARMAR ASHOK NARANBHAI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 35/2024
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.
TAPP LC - Application for Termination
CNR: GJGN060002202024
Next Hearing
03rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
35/2024
Filing Date
03-07-2024
Registration No
35/2024
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, KALOL
Judge
1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARMAR ASHOK NARANBHAI
Adv. A N PATEL
Respondent(s)
THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 06-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 09-01-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 20-12-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 15-11-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: Labour Court, Kalol, Gujarat Case: Interim Application No. 35-2024 under Section 119(D) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1946 Judge: S.K. Solanki Date: 15/03/2025 Outcome The interim application for interim relief (subsistence allowance during pending case) is DISMISSED/REJECTED. The employee's petition challenging the termination order remains pending, but the court denied the request for 75% monthly wages as interim relief during the pendency of the main case. The court held that interim relief cannot be granted at this stage as it would amount to giving final relief before the case's merits are decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Labour Court, Kalol, Gujarat Case: Interim Application No. 35-2024 under Section 119(D) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1946 Judge: S.K. Solanki Date: 15/03/2025 Outcome The interim application for interim relief (subsistence allowance during pending case) is DISMISSED/REJECTED. The employee's petition challenging the termination order remains pending, but the court denied the request for 75% monthly wages as interim relief during the pendency of the main case. The court held that interim relief cannot be granted at this stage as it would amount to giving final relief before the case's merits are decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts