PARMAR ASHOK NARANBHAI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 35/2024

Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.

For Evidence of Applicant Next hearing 03-Apr-2026 this date has passed

TAPP LC - Application for Termination

CNR: GJGN060002202024

Filing Number

35/2024

Filing Date

03-Jul-2024

Registration No

35/2024

Registration Date

03-Jul-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, KALOL

Judge

1-Judge Labour Court Kalol

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARMAR ASHOK NARANBHAI

    Adv. A N PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA

Case History

  1. 03-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  5. 20-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  6. 15-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  7. 04-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  8. 02-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  9. 07-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  10. 15-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  11. 17-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  12. 27-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  13. 29-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 22-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 15-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  16. 05-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 15-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Court: Labour Court, Kalol, Gujarat Case: Interim Application No. 35-2024 under Section 119(D) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1946 Judge: S.K. Solanki Date: 15/03/2025 Outcome The interim application for interim relief (subsistence allowance during pending case) is DISMISSED/REJECTED. The employee's petition challenging the termination order remains pending, but the court denied the request for 75% monthly wages as interim relief during the pendency of the main case. The court held that interim relief cannot be granted at this stage as it would amount to giving final relief before the case's merits are decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 15-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  19. 11-Mar-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 27-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 11-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 01-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 04-Jan-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 07-Dec-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 22-Oct-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 05-Oct-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 03-Sep-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 06-Aug-2024

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 03-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 03-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court: Labour Court, Kalol, Gujarat Case: Interim Application No. 35-2024 under Section 119(D) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1946 Judge: S.K. Solanki Date: 15/03/2025 Outcome The interim application for interim relief (subsistence allowance during pending case) is DISMISSED/REJECTED. The employee's petition challenging the termination order remains pending, but the court denied the request for 75% monthly wages as interim relief during the pendency of the main case. The court held that interim relief cannot be granted at this stage as it would amount to giving final relief before the case's merits are decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case