PARMAR PUSHPABEN SHAILESHBHAI vs HILLWELL HOMIO PVT LTD Advocate - Y M SHAH — 67/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJGN060002052022
Filing Number
67/2022
Filing Date
07-Oct-2022
Registration No
67/2022
Registration Date
07-Oct-2022
Court
LABOUR COURT, KALOL
Judge
1-Judge Labour Court Kalol
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARMAR PUSHPABEN SHAILESHBHAI
Adv. K C VEKARIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HILLWELL HOMIO PVT LTD Advocate - Y M SHAH
-
2.KESHAR LABOUR CONTRACTOR
Adv. J L DESAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Labour Court (S.D.), Kalol decided a reference case involving Pushpaben Shaileshbhai Parmar, an employee who was terminated after 14 years of service. The court found merit in the employee's claim and ordered reinstatement with full back wages of ₹35,000 (plus arrears) to be paid within 15 days, while rejecting the employer's contentions that the termination was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
06-Mar-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
06-Feb-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
23-Jan-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
02-Jan-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
28-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
21-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
03-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
12-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
22-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
25-Jul-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
20-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
09-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
28-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Feb-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
30-Dec-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
30-Nov-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Nov-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
04-Oct-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
20-Sep-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
16-Aug-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
19-Jul-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
28-Jun-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-May-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
19-Apr-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
22-Mar-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
23-Feb-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
19-Jan-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Dec-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Dec-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
20-Oct-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
22-Sep-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
18-Aug-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
28-Jul-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
07-Jul-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Jun-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-May-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
07-Apr-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-Mar-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Feb-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
20-Jan-2023
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
30-Dec-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Dec-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
22-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 67/2022
Summary The Labour Court (S.D.), Kalol decided a reference case involving Pushpaben Shaileshbhai Parmar, an employee who was terminated after 14 years of service. The court found merit in the employee's claim and ordered reinstatement with full back wages of ₹35,000 (plus arrears) to be paid within 15 days, while rejecting the employer's contentions that the termination was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts