PARMAR DIVYANG VINODBHAI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 14/2024

Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.

For Evidence of Applicant Next hearing 03-Apr-2026 this date has passed

TAPP LC - Application for Termination

CNR: GJGN060001992024

Filing Number

14/2024

Filing Date

03-Jul-2024

Registration No

14/2024

Registration Date

03-Jul-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, KALOL

Judge

1-Judge Labour Court Kalol

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARMAR DIVYANG VINODBHAI

    Adv. A N PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA

Case History

  1. 03-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  5. 20-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  6. 15-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  7. 04-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  8. 02-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  9. 07-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  10. 15-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  11. 17-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  12. 27-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  13. 29-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 22-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 15-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  16. 05-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 15-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Labour Court, Kalol dismissed the interim application filed by an employee seeking subsistence allowance (75% of monthly wages) during the pendency of their termination case under the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946. The court found that granting such interim relief at this stage was not legally justified, as established jurisprudence requires the main case to be decided on merits first before awarding final relief or compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 15-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  19. 11-Mar-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 27-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 11-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 01-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 04-Jan-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 07-Dec-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 22-Oct-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 05-Oct-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 03-Sep-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 06-Aug-2024

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 03-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 03-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Labour Court, Kalol dismissed the interim application filed by an employee seeking subsistence allowance (75% of monthly wages) during the pendency of their termination case under the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946. The court found that granting such interim relief at this stage was not legally justified, as established jurisprudence requires the main case to be decided on merits first before awarding final relief or compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case