PRAJAPATI VISHNU BHIKHABHAI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 12/2024
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.
TAPP LC - Application for Termination
CNR: GJGN060001972024
Next Hearing
03rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
12/2024
Filing Date
03-07-2024
Registration No
12/2024
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, KALOL
Judge
1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAJAPATI VISHNU BHIKHABHAI
Adv. A N PATEL
Respondent(s)
THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 06-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 09-01-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 20-12-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 15-11-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Order Summary Court: Labour Court, Kalol, Gujarat Case: BIR Interim Application No. 12-2024 under Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946, Section 119(D) Outcome: The worker's interim application for subsistence allowance (75% of wages) during the pendency of the case is DISMISSED/REJECTED. The court held that while it has authority under Section 119(D) to grant interim relief, the worker has not established a prima facie case, proof of irreparable harm, or balance of convenience in their favor to warrant subsistence allowance at this interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Order Summary Court: Labour Court, Kalol, Gujarat Case: BIR Interim Application No. 12-2024 under Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946, Section 119(D) Outcome: The worker's interim application for subsistence allowance (75% of wages) during the pendency of the case is DISMISSED/REJECTED. The court held that while it has authority under Section 119(D) to grant interim relief, the worker has not established a prima facie case, proof of irreparable harm, or balance of convenience in their favor to warrant subsistence allowance at this interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts