RAJPUT DILIPSINH SHANKARJI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 7/2024

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge Labour Court Kalol

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge Labour Court Kalol

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge Labour Court Kalol

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge Labour Court Kalol

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge Labour Court Kalol

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge Labour Court Kalol

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge Labour Court Kalol

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge Labour Court Kalol

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge Labour Court Kalol

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge Labour Court Kalol

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge Labour Court Kalol

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

OrderView PDF

Summary The Labour Court, Kalol dismissed the worker's interim application seeking 75% subsistence allowance during the pendency of the main case under Section 119(D) of the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946. The court held that interim relief of this nature cannot be granted at an intermediate stage before the main case is decided on merits, and that such final relief is only available after the conclusion of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

For Evidence of Applicant

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Notice Serve to opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 7/2024