SOLANKI AJAY JASHVANTBHAI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 6/2024
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.
TAPP LC - Application for Termination
CNR: GJGN060001912024
Next Hearing
03rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6/2024
Filing Date
03-07-2024
Registration No
6/2024
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, KALOL
Judge
1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SOLANKI AJAY JASHVANTBHAI
Adv. A N PATEL
Respondent(s)
THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 06-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 09-01-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 20-12-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 15-11-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Summary Petition Dismissed: The Labour Court of Kalol rejected the interim application filed by an employee under the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946, Section 119(D) seeking interim relief of 75% subsistence allowance during the pendency of the main case against wrongful termination. The court held that interim relief cannot be granted at this stage since the employee's substantive case and the employer's defense remain to be adjudicated on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Petition Dismissed: The Labour Court of Kalol rejected the interim application filed by an employee under the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946, Section 119(D) seeking interim relief of 75% subsistence allowance during the pendency of the main case against wrongful termination. The court held that interim relief cannot be granted at this stage since the employee's substantive case and the employer's defense remain to be adjudicated on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts