PARMAR MAHESH BHIKHABHAI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 3/2024

Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.

For Evidence of Applicant Next hearing 03-Apr-2026 this date has passed

TAPP LC - Application for Termination

CNR: GJGN060001882024

Filing Number

3/2024

Filing Date

03-Jul-2024

Registration No

3/2024

Registration Date

03-Jul-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, KALOL

Judge

1-Judge Labour Court Kalol

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARMAR MAHESH BHIKHABHAI

    Adv. A N PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA

Case History

  1. 03-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  5. 20-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  6. 15-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  7. 04-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  8. 02-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  9. 07-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  10. 15-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  11. 17-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  12. 27-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge Labour Court Kalol

  13. 29-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 22-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 15-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  16. 05-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 15-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

  18. 15-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

  19. 15-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Labour Court, Kalol dismissed the worker's interim application (BIR No. 3-2024) seeking 75% subsistence allowance during the pendency of his case challenging his dismissal from Samavalala Mills Company. The court found that since the dismissal order is being challenged and no final judgment has been rendered, interim relief in the form of subsistence allowance cannot be granted at this stage, as such relief is typically awarded only after the main case concludes in the worker's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 15-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 11-Mar-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 27-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 11-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 01-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 04-Jan-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 07-Dec-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 22-Oct-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 05-Oct-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 03-Sep-2024

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 06-Aug-2024

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 03-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 03-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Labour Court, Kalol dismissed the worker's interim application (BIR No. 3-2024) seeking 75% subsistence allowance during the pendency of his case challenging his dismissal from Samavalala Mills Company. The court found that since the dismissal order is being challenged and no final judgment has been rendered, interim relief in the form of subsistence allowance cannot be granted at this stage, as such relief is typically awarded only after the main case concludes in the worker's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case