PARMAR MAHESH BHIKHABHAI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 3/2024
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.
TAPP LC - Application for Termination
CNR: GJGN060001882024
Next Hearing
03rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3/2024
Filing Date
03-07-2024
Registration No
3/2024
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, KALOL
Judge
1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARMAR MAHESH BHIKHABHAI
Adv. A N PATEL
Respondent(s)
THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 06-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 09-01-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 20-12-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 15-11-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Summary The Labour Court, Kalol dismissed the worker's interim application (BIR No. 3-2024) seeking 75% subsistence allowance during the pendency of his case challenging his dismissal from Samavalala Mills Company. The court found that since the dismissal order is being challenged and no final judgment has been rendered, interim relief in the form of subsistence allowance cannot be granted at this stage, as such relief is typically awarded only after the main case concludes in the worker's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Labour Court, Kalol dismissed the worker's interim application (BIR No. 3-2024) seeking 75% subsistence allowance during the pendency of his case challenging his dismissal from Samavalala Mills Company. The court found that since the dismissal order is being challenged and no final judgment has been rendered, interim relief in the form of subsistence allowance cannot be granted at this stage, as such relief is typically awarded only after the main case concludes in the worker's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts