JITENDRA G GOHIL vs HITACHI HOME AND LIFE SOLUTION I LTD Advocate - B M SHETH — 80/2015
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 010. Status: For Evidence of opponent. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJGN060000942015
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
80/2015
Filing Date
16-09-2015
Registration No
80/2015
Registration Date
16-09-2015
Court
LABOUR COURT, KALOL
Judge
1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JITENDRA G GOHIL
Adv. AMRISH PATEL
Respondent(s)
HITACHI HOME AND LIFE SOLUTION I LTD Advocate - B M SHETH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
For Evidence of opponent
For Evidence of opponent
For Evidence of opponent
For Evidence of opponent
For Evidence of opponent
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | For Evidence of opponent | |
| 06-02-2026 | For Evidence of opponent | |
| 23-01-2026 | For Evidence of opponent | |
| 09-01-2026 | For Evidence of opponent | |
| 20-12-2025 | For Evidence of opponent |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Kalol dismissed the second respondent's petition in Reference (T) Case No. 80/2015. The court rejected the claim for reinstatement with back wages, finding that the second respondent failed to establish the required conditions and did not submit proper evidence to support the petition. The court upheld the first respondent's reference while declining to award any relief regarding case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Kalol dismissed the second respondent's petition in Reference (T) Case No. 80/2015. The court rejected the claim for reinstatement with back wages, finding that the second respondent failed to establish the required conditions and did not submit proper evidence to support the petition. The court upheld the first respondent's reference while declining to award any relief regarding case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts