PATEL GIRISHBHAI PRAHLADBHAI vs THAKOR BHIKHIBEN D/O PRATAPJI JUGAJI W/O THAKOR AMBARAM CHHAGANJI — 302/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 10,31,38. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 29-Apr-2026

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJGN050062442024

Filing Number

302/2024

Filing Date

21-Dec-2024

Registration No

302/2024

Registration Date

21-Dec-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALOL

Judge

10-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 10,31,38
Code of Civil Procedure Section 151
Ia/1/2024 Classification : Interim Application Section PATEL GIRISHBHAI PRAHLADBHAITHAKOR BHIKHIBEN D/O PRATAPJI JUGAJI W/O THAKOR AMBARAM CHHAGANJI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PATEL GIRISHBHAI PRAHLADBHAI

    Adv. P R KERALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR BHIKHIBEN D/O PRATAPJI JUGAJI W/O THAKOR AMBARAM CHHAGANJI

  2. 2.THAKOR MANGAJI JOITAJI

  3. 3.NADIYA ASHABEN D/O KANTIBHAI PUNJABHAI W/O NADIYA KANUBHAI DHANABHAI

  4. 4.THAKOR AMIBEN D/O GEMAJI W/O PANAJI THAKOR

  5. 5.THAKOR CHAMPABEN D/O GEMAJI W/O THAKOR RAMESHJI

  6. 6.THAKRO MANGAJI GEMAJI

Case History

  1. 29-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 30-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  5. 09-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Kalol rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from transferring agricultural land in Gandhinagar. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish all three required conditions: no prima facie case (due to 12-year delay and acquiescence), balance of convenience against the plaintiff (property already transferred via registered deed), and no irreparable injury (rights enforceable through specific performance or damages). The plaintiff may continue pursuing specific performance in the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 28-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  8. 09-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  9. 08-Sep-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  10. 24-Jul-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  11. 17-Jun-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 25-Apr-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 20-Mar-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 25-Feb-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 27-Jan-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 21-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 21-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 302/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Kalol rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from transferring agricultural land in Gandhinagar. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish all three required conditions: no prima facie case (due to 12-year delay and acquiescence), balance of convenience against the plaintiff (property already transferred via registered deed), and no irreparable injury (rights enforceable through specific performance or damages). The plaintiff may continue pursuing specific performance in the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case