GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs VIJAYBHAI BACHUBHAI DANTANI Advocate - P N BAROT — 3438/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,324,323,337,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGN050045722021
Filing Number
3438/2021
Filing Date
11-Oct-2021
Registration No
3438/2021
Registration Date
11-Oct-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALOL
Judge
7-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11216022210337
Police Station
KALOL TALUKA POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIJAYBHAI BACHUBHAI DANTANI Advocate - P N BAROT
-
2.KAMLESH VIJAYBHAI DANTANI
Adv. P N BAROT
-
3.SHAILESHBHAI VIJAYBHAI DANTANI
Adv. P N BAROT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: Criminal Case 3438/2021 The court acquitted all three accused (Vijaybhai Bachubhai Dantani, Kamlesh Vijaybhai Dantani, and Shaileshbhai Vijaybhai Dantani) of charges under IPC sections 326, 324, 506(2), 114, and GP Act section 135. The complainant failed to establish the allegations of assault and attempted murder beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution's oral evidence was contradictory and insufficient, with witnesses acknowledging during cross-examination that the accused did not cause grievous injuries or attempt to kill. The court found that only the complainant and his son testified, which was inadequate to prove the case conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
30-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
28-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
30-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
07-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
18-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
03-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
03-May-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
15-Mar-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Jan-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Dec-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Nov-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Oct-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Aug-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Jul-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-May-2022
Process To Accused
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Mar-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Feb-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Jan-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Dec-2021
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Nov-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Oct-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 3438/2021
Case Summary: Criminal Case 3438/2021 The court acquitted all three accused (Vijaybhai Bachubhai Dantani, Kamlesh Vijaybhai Dantani, and Shaileshbhai Vijaybhai Dantani) of charges under IPC sections 326, 324, 506(2), 114, and GP Act section 135. The complainant failed to establish the allegations of assault and attempted murder beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution's oral evidence was contradictory and insufficient, with witnesses acknowledging during cross-examination that the accused did not cause grievous injuries or attempt to kill. The court found that only the complainant and his son testified, which was inadequate to prove the case conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts