NILESH KANUBHAI THAKKAR DIRECTOR OF TULIP LEMCRAFT PVT.LTD. vs VIJAY RAJESH PAREKH Advocate - J B THAKKAR — 1336/2020
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 24th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGN050020582020
Filing Number
1336/2020
Filing Date
15-Oct-2020
Registration No
1336/2020
Registration Date
15-Oct-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALOL
Judge
9-2nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NILESH KANUBHAI THAKKAR DIRECTOR OF TULIP LEMCRAFT PVT.LTD.
Adv. D G THAKOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIJAY RAJESH PAREKH Advocate - J B THAKKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order
The court dismissed the case against the accused under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, due to prolonged non-prosecution and the accused's prolonged absence from court proceedings. The judgment noted that the case fell under the "targeted case" category, and as the prosecution failed to make progress or submit evidence over an extended period, dismissal was the only appropriate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
2nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
2nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
21-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
2nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
2nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
31-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
2nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
03-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
2nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
01-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
2nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
06-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
2nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
02-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
2nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-May-2025
Process To Accused
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
16-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
19-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
06-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Sep-2024
Plea
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
07-Aug-2024
Plea
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
12-Jun-2024
Plea
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Apr-2024
Plea
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Feb-2024
Plea
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
16-Jan-2024
Plea
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
06-Dec-2023
Plea
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Oct-2023
Plea
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
06-Sep-2023
Plea
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
20-Jul-2023
Plea
3rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
10-May-2023
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
12-Apr-2023
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
13-Mar-2023
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Feb-2023
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
24-Jan-2023
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Dec-2022
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
12-Dec-2022
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
14-Nov-2022
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Oct-2022
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-Sep-2022
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
10-Aug-2022
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
30-Jun-2022
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Jun-2022
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
08-Apr-2022
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
19-Feb-2022
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
18-Dec-2021
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
11-Nov-2021
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
18-Sep-2021
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
12-Aug-2021
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
17-Jun-2021
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
16-Apr-2021
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
25-Mar-2021
Plea
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
06-Feb-2021
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
19-Dec-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Oct-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 1336/2020
The court dismissed the case against the accused under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, due to prolonged non-prosecution and the accused's prolonged absence from court proceedings. The judgment noted that the case fell under the "targeted case" category, and as the prosecution failed to make progress or submit evidence over an extended period, dismissal was the only appropriate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts