PARESH RAGHUBHAI PATEL vs AMRUTBHAI KALIDAS VAKIL ON BEHALF OF SHIVAM CORPORATION NAMED PARTNERSHIP FIRM — 17/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 47.1. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU

CNR: GJGN050004362026

Filing Number

17/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALOL

Judge

10-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 47.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARESH RAGHUBHAI PATEL

    Adv. A K PANDYA

  2. 2.BHARAT RAGHUBHAI PATEL

  3. 3.DHARMENDRA RAGHUBHAI PATEL

  4. 4.KAMLABEN RAGHUBHAI PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMRUTBHAI KALIDAS VAKIL ON BEHALF OF SHIVAM CORPORATION NAMED PARTNERSHIP FIRM

  2. 2.RANCHHODBHAI AMBALAL PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Additional Civil Judge, Kalol rejected the applicants' review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 of the CPC, holding that the applicants are necessary and proper parties to the underlying suit (RCS 201/2001) challenging alleged fraudulent property transfers, since they have admitted purchasing the disputed properties and have direct interest in the matter. The court found no error in the previous order joining them as defendants and reasoned that questions about suppression of facts and transaction validity must be decided during trial on evidence, not in review proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Civil Judge, Kalol rejected the applicants' review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 of the CPC, holding that the applicants are necessary and proper parties to the underlying suit (RCS 201/2001) challenging alleged fraudulent property transfers, since they have admitted purchasing the disputed properties and have direct interest in the matter. The court found no error in the previous order joining them as defendants and reasoned that questions about suppression of facts and transaction validity must be decided during trial on evidence, not in review proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case