RAJESHBHAI LEKHRAJBHAI SHAH PROPRIETOR OF JAYPRABHU TRADING COMPANY vs ANIL LIMITED COMPANY — 1103/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGN040016002025

Filing Number

1103/2025

Filing Date

10-Dec-2025

Registration No

1103/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANSA

Judge

3-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141

Petitioner(s)

1.RAJESHBHAI LEKHRAJBHAI SHAH PROPRIETOR OF JAYPRABHU TRADING COMPANY

Adv. M R BHATT

Respondent(s)

1.ANIL LIMITED COMPANY
2.AMOL SHRIPAL SHETH DIRECTORS OF ANIL LIMITED
3.KAMALBHAI RAMESHBHAI SHETH
4.ANISH KASTURBHAI SHAH
5.RAJUBHAI PARIKH
6.SHASHIN AJITKUMAR DESAI
7.ANIL MINES AND MINERAL LIMITED
8.VISHAD ASHOK JAGASHETH
9.MANISH GIRISHCHANDRA SHAH
10.JAIRAJ HARISHCHAND PEDNEKAR
11.SWETANG PATEL
12.SHASHIN MEHTA
13.KETAN D. PATEL
14.MANISH M PATEL

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
09-Mar-2026

Order

The court decided to consolidate two criminal cases (Case No. 44/25 and 1103/25) pending before the same inquiry officer, as they involve overlapping facts and parties. Criminal Case No. 1103/25, which was conditionally dismissed, has been disposed of with costs, while proceedings in Case No. 44/25 will continue before the senior inquiry officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
09-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
02-Feb-2026

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
15-Dec-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
10-Dec-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 1103/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court decided to consolidate two criminal cases (Case No. 44/25 and 1103/25) pending before the same inquiry officer, as they involve overlapping facts and parties. Criminal Case No. 1103/25, which was conditionally dismissed, has been disposed of with costs, while proceedings in Case No. 44/25 will continue before the senior inquiry officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.