PARTNERS AND ADMNISTARORS OF MOTHERS SEEDS CARE KULDIPSINH VAGHELA vs ZALA DIGVIJAYSINH PRADYUMANSINH — 58/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 09th March 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJGN040013852022
Filing Number
58/2022
Filing Date
10-Nov-2022
Registration No
58/2022
Registration Date
10-Nov-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANSA
Judge
3-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARTNERS AND ADMNISTARORS OF MOTHERS SEEDS CARE KULDIPSINH VAGHELA
Adv. B M PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.ZALA DIGVIJAYSINH PRADYUMANSINH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court ordered the closure of a criminal inquiry under CrPC Section 203 against the accused, who had not appeared before the court for over four years despite repeated notices and opportunities to advance proceedings. The court found that further time should not be granted to the accused and decided to discontinue the investigation due to prolonged non-cooperation and absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
01-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
02-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
06-May-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
24-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
17-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
17-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
02-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
08-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
14-May-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
12-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
16-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
21-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
24-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
22-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
23-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
13-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
16-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
11-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
08-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
21-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
17-May-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
19-Apr-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
24-Mar-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
10-Feb-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
06-Jan-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
19-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2022
The court ordered the closure of a criminal inquiry under CrPC Section 203 against the accused, who had not appeared before the court for over four years despite repeated notices and opportunities to advance proceedings. The court found that further time should not be granted to the accused and decided to discontinue the investigation due to prolonged non-cooperation and absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts