TRIVEDI ATUKLUMAR AMARATLAL vs JOSHI BHIKHABHAI JAGANNATH Advocate - J R RATHOD — 866/2019

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGN040013402019

Filing Number

866/2019

Filing Date

05-Aug-2019

Registration No

866/2019

Registration Date

05-Aug-2019

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANSA

Judge

3-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TRIVEDI ATUKLUMAR AMARATLAL

    Adv. B N JANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JOSHI BHIKHABHAI JAGANNATH Advocate - J R RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court dismissed Criminal Case No. 866/2019 (under the Negotiable Instruments Act) for default by the complainant. The case had been pending for 6 years, during which the complainant repeatedly failed to provide the accused's correct address despite multiple adjournments, preventing service of summons and proceeding with trial. The court held that the complainant's negligence and dormant prosecution of the case violated their duty to diligently pursue proceedings, thereby burdening the judiciary and delaying justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  7. 10-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  8. 29-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  9. 18-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  10. 21-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  11. 05-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  12. 01-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 15-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 01-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 02-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 30-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 26-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 03-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 29-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 26-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 27-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 03-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 16-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 19-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 15-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 16-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 16-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 18-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 20-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 12-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 11-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 14-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 10-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 12-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 08-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 03-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 27-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 24-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 19-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 14-Nov-2022

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 19-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  42. 25-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  43. 06-Jun-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  44. 04-Apr-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  45. 14-Feb-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  46. 10-Jan-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  47. 24-Nov-2021

    Process To Accused

    5th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  48. 25-Oct-2021

    Process To Accused

    5th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  49. 02-Aug-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  50. 24-May-2021

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  51. 23-Mar-2021

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  52. 07-Nov-2020

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  53. 29-Aug-2020

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  54. 06-Jun-2020

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  55. 04-Apr-2020

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  56. 10-Feb-2020

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  57. 02-Dec-2019

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  58. 14-Oct-2019

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  59. 23-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 05-Aug-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 866/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed Criminal Case No. 866/2019 (under the Negotiable Instruments Act) for default by the complainant. The case had been pending for 6 years, during which the complainant repeatedly failed to provide the accused's correct address despite multiple adjournments, preventing service of summons and proceeding with trial. The court held that the complainant's negligence and dormant prosecution of the case violated their duty to diligently pursue proceedings, thereby burdening the judiciary and delaying justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case