GULSANBEN SABIRHUSEN AJMERI vs AJMERI HASINABEN DINMAHAMMAD Advocate - M.R.BHATT — 121/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 19. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJGN040012362019

Filing Number

121/2019

Filing Date

19-Jul-2019

Registration No

121/2019

Registration Date

19-Jul-2019

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANSA

Judge

3-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULSANBEN SABIRHUSEN AJMERI

    Adv. M J CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJMERI HASINABEN DINMAHAMMAD Advocate - M.R.BHATT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. 121/2019 - Gulsanben Sabirhusen Ajmeri v. Ajmeri Hasinaben Dinmahammad The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit claiming ₹50,000 in damages for alleged malicious prosecution, finding the plaintiff failed to prove the defendant filed a false complaint. The defendant claimed she returned home mid-day on 07/09/2018 after receiving news of a death and witnessed an altercation during unauthorized construction, then filed a genuine police complaint. The court accepted the defendant's corroborated narrative supported by her husband's testimony and RTI evidence showing ASHA workers operate with flexible hours allowing mid-day absences. Critically, the plaintiff produced no documentary proof of business losses, expenses, or mental trauma, and no independent witnesses contradicted the defendant's account. Since the plaintiff failed to establish the essential elements of malicious prosecution—particularly absence of reasonable cause and malice—the court held no actionable tort occurred and awarded no damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  10. 26-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  13. 10-Sep-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  14. 20-Aug-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  15. 23-Jul-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  16. 24-Jun-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  17. 29-Apr-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  18. 02-Apr-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  19. 10-Mar-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  20. 10-Feb-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  21. 27-Jan-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  22. 16-Dec-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  23. 13-Nov-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  24. 16-Oct-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  25. 20-Sep-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  26. 02-Sep-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  27. 06-Aug-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  28. 09-Jul-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  29. 13-Jun-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  30. 30-Apr-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  31. 09-Apr-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  32. 12-Mar-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  33. 16-Feb-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  34. 23-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  35. 03-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  36. 05-Dec-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  37. 27-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  38. 03-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  39. 04-Sep-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  40. 02-Aug-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  41. 03-Jul-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  42. 24-May-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  43. 03-May-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  44. 05-Apr-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  45. 28-Feb-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  46. 04-Feb-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  47. 03-Jan-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  48. 13-Dec-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  49. 07-Dec-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  50. 04-Nov-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  51. 02-Nov-2022

    Restored

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  52. 14-Jul-2022

    OrderView PDF

  53. 14-Jul-2022

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  54. 08-Jun-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  55. 07-Apr-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  56. 12-Mar-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  57. 18-Feb-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  58. 31-Dec-2021

    Issues

    5th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  59. 10-Nov-2021

    Issues

    5th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  60. 08-Sep-2021

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  61. 15-Jul-2021

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  62. 10-Jun-2021

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  63. 16-Mar-2021

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  64. 07-Jan-2021

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  65. 26-Nov-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  66. 17-Sep-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  67. 09-Jul-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  68. 07-May-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  69. 21-Mar-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  70. 14-Feb-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  71. 26-Dec-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  72. 24-Oct-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  73. 29-Aug-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  74. 19-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 121/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. 121/2019 - Gulsanben Sabirhusen Ajmeri v. Ajmeri Hasinaben Dinmahammad The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit claiming ₹50,000 in damages for alleged malicious prosecution, finding the plaintiff failed to prove the defendant filed a false complaint. The defendant claimed she returned home mid-day on 07/09/2018 after receiving news of a death and witnessed an altercation during unauthorized construction, then filed a genuine police complaint. The court accepted the defendant's corroborated narrative supported by her husband's testimony and RTI evidence showing ASHA workers operate with flexible hours allowing mid-day absences. Critically, the plaintiff produced no documentary proof of business losses, expenses, or mental trauma, and no independent witnesses contradicted the defendant's account. Since the plaintiff failed to establish the essential elements of malicious prosecution—particularly absence of reasonable cause and malice—the court held no actionable tort occurred and awarded no damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case