BAPUBHAI LAVJIBHAI CHAUDHARY vs THAKOR SHAKARAJI JAVANJI LEGAL HEIR OF LATE JAVANJI GALABJI — 47/2020

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJGN040003932020

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

47/2020

Filing Date

02-03-2020

Registration No

47/2020

Registration Date

02-03-2020

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANSA

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34,38,

Petitioner(s)

BAPUBHAI LAVJIBHAI CHAUDHARY

Adv. K.N.MEHTA

Respondent(s)

THAKOR SHAKARAJI JAVANJI LEGAL HEIR OF LATE JAVANJI GALABJI

THAKOR AMBALAL JAVANJI LEGAL HEIR OF LATE JAVANJI GALABJI(Abated)

THAKOR LILABEN JAVANJI LEGAL HEIR OF LATE JAVANJI GALABJI

THAKOR KANKUBEN JAVANJI LEGAL HEIR OF LATE JAVANJI GALABJI(Abated)

THAKOR RAMANJI JAVANAJI LEGAL HEIR OF LATE JAVANJI GALABJI

THAKOR MANIBEN JAVANJI LEGAL HEIR OF LATE JAVANJI GALABJI

THAKOR SITABEN JAVANJI LEGAL HEIR OF LATE JAVANJI GALABJI(Abated)

THAKOR VISHNUJI JAVANJI LEGAL HEIR OF LATE JAVANJI GALABJI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

23-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

09-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

24-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

28-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

13-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

15-07-2025
ORDER

Summary: The Principal Civil Judge, Mansa, granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a property dispute case (RCS 47.2020). The court found the plaintiff has established a prima facie case, would suffer irreparable loss, and the balance of convenience favors him. The defendants are restrained from selling, mortgaging, alienating, transferring, or creating any interest in the agricultural land (Survey No. 453 and 452/6) during the suit's pendency, with status quo to be maintained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Civil Judge, Mansa, granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a property dispute case (RCS 47.2020). The court found the plaintiff has established a prima facie case, would suffer irreparable loss, and the balance of convenience favors him. The defendants are restrained from selling, mortgaging, alienating, transferring, or creating any interest in the agricultural land (Survey No. 453 and 452/6) during the suit's pendency, with status quo to be maintained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MANSA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case