PATEL RAMESHBHAI DAHYABHAI vs PATEL VISHNUBHAI JOITABHAI Advocate - J B UPADHYAY — 65/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGN040001132023

Filing Number

65/2023

Filing Date

24-Jan-2023

Registration No

65/2023

Registration Date

24-Jan-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANSA

Judge

3-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PATEL RAMESHBHAI DAHYABHAI

    Adv. B D PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL VISHNUBHAI JOITABHAI Advocate - J B UPADHYAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Case 65/2023 Court's Decision: The court convicted the accused, Patel Vishnubhai Joitabhai, under the Negotiable Instrument Act Section 138 for issuing dishonored checks. The accused was sentenced to two years imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 9,95,000 to the complainant within 60 days, with additional rigorous imprisonment if payment defaults. Key Reasoning: The court found that the complainant (Patel Rameshbhai) had proven all essential elements under Section 138: the checks were issued for a legitimate debt, they were dishonored due to insufficient funds, and despite notice, the accused failed to pay. The accused's defense that the checks were not issued for consideration was rejected as bare denial lacking credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  4. 06-May-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  10. 29-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  11. 24-Nov-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  12. 27-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  13. 22-Sep-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  14. 18-Aug-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  15. 14-Jul-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  16. 25-Jun-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  17. 20-May-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  18. 29-Apr-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  19. 02-Apr-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  20. 10-Mar-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  21. 05-Feb-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  22. 16-Jan-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  23. 24-Dec-2024

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  24. 27-Nov-2024

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  25. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  26. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  27. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  28. 21-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  29. 23-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  30. 26-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  31. 27-May-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  32. 30-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  33. 03-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  34. 13-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  35. 15-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  36. 12-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  37. 07-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  38. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  39. 14-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  40. 04-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  41. 30-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  42. 19-May-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  43. 20-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  44. 06-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 24-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 65/2023 Court's Decision: The court convicted the accused, Patel Vishnubhai Joitabhai, under the Negotiable Instrument Act Section 138 for issuing dishonored checks. The accused was sentenced to two years imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation of Rs. 9,95,000 to the complainant within 60 days, with additional rigorous imprisonment if payment defaults. Key Reasoning: The court found that the complainant (Patel Rameshbhai) had proven all essential elements under Section 138: the checks were issued for a legitimate debt, they were dishonored due to insufficient funds, and despite notice, the accused failed to pay. The accused's defense that the checks were not issued for consideration was rejected as bare denial lacking credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case