DEPUTY ENGINEER SHRI DARSHANKUMAR MADHUKAR MAJMUDAR (UGVCL) DEHGAM (RULAR) vs DOLATSINH DOLAJI CHAUHAN @ DOLSINH DAHAYSINH CHAUHAN — 228/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 19. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJGN030024422023

Filing Number

228/2023

Filing Date

10-Oct-2023

Registration No

228/2023

Registration Date

10-Oct-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY ENGINEER SHRI DARSHANKUMAR MADHUKAR MAJMUDAR (UGVCL) DEHGAM (RULAR)

    Adv. J T PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DOLATSINH DOLAJI CHAUHAN @ DOLSINH DAHAYSINH CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS No. 228/2023 Court Decision: The Primary Civil Court at Dahegam partially allowed the plaintiff's (UGVCL) claim. The court decreed that the defendant pay Rs. 9,882.35 as the outstanding electricity bill amount plus 6% annual interest from the date the bill was issued until payment, and directed the defendant to bear the court costs. Key Facts: The defendant was caught illegally drawing electricity by tampering with the power line, consuming 267 kilowatts without authorization. The electricity company issued a bill for the unauthorized consumption, which the defendant failed to pay despite receiving a legal notice. The court found the defendant liable for the dues and ordered recovery with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  9. 09-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  11. 21-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  12. 25-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  13. 20-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  14. 24-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  15. 13-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  16. 12-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  17. 08-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  18. 20-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  19. 27-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  20. 03-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  21. 30-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  22. 29-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  23. 10-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  24. 01-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  25. 19-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  26. 15-Jan-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  27. 04-Dec-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  28. 12-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 10-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 228/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 228/2023 Court Decision: The Primary Civil Court at Dahegam partially allowed the plaintiff's (UGVCL) claim. The court decreed that the defendant pay Rs. 9,882.35 as the outstanding electricity bill amount plus 6% annual interest from the date the bill was issued until payment, and directed the defendant to bear the court costs. Key Facts: The defendant was caught illegally drawing electricity by tampering with the power line, consuming 267 kilowatts without authorization. The electricity company issued a bill for the unauthorized consumption, which the defendant failed to pay despite receiving a legal notice. The court found the defendant liable for the dues and ordered recovery with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case