DEPUTY ENGINEER SHRI DARSHANKUMAR MADHUKAR MAJMUDAR (UGVCL) DEHGAM (RULAR) vs VINABEN @ HINABEN KALUSINH LALSINH CHAUHAN — 226/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 19. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJGN030024402023

Filing Number

226/2023

Filing Date

10-Oct-2023

Registration No

226/2023

Registration Date

10-Oct-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY ENGINEER SHRI DARSHANKUMAR MADHUKAR MAJMUDAR (UGVCL) DEHGAM (RULAR)

    Adv. J T PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINABEN @ HINABEN KALUSINH LALSINH CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: RCS No. 226-2023 Court Decision: The Primary Civil Court at Dahegam partially allowed the plaintiff UGVCL's claim against defendant Vinaben Chauhan for unpaid electricity bills. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 8,032.83/- with 6% annual interest from the bill date until full payment, plus all litigation costs to be borne by the defendant. Key Facts: The defendant was caught illegally stealing electricity (199 kWh) from an unauthorized connection. Despite receiving a power theft bill of Rs. 6,841.54/- and subsequent legal notices, the defendant failed to pay the outstanding amount of Rs. 8,032.83/-. The defendant did not contest the charges or provide any defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  9. 09-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  11. 21-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  12. 25-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  13. 20-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  14. 24-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  15. 13-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  16. 12-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  17. 08-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  18. 20-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  19. 27-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  20. 03-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  21. 30-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  22. 29-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  23. 10-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  24. 01-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  25. 19-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  26. 15-Jan-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  27. 04-Dec-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  28. 12-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 10-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 226/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 226-2023 Court Decision: The Primary Civil Court at Dahegam partially allowed the plaintiff UGVCL's claim against defendant Vinaben Chauhan for unpaid electricity bills. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 8,032.83/- with 6% annual interest from the bill date until full payment, plus all litigation costs to be borne by the defendant. Key Facts: The defendant was caught illegally stealing electricity (199 kWh) from an unauthorized connection. Despite receiving a power theft bill of Rs. 6,841.54/- and subsequent legal notices, the defendant failed to pay the outstanding amount of Rs. 8,032.83/-. The defendant did not contest the charges or provide any defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case