DEPUTY ENGINEER SHRI DARSHANKUMAR MADHUKAR MAJMUDAR (UGVCL) DEHGAM (RULAR) vs KIRANSINH UDESINH CHAUHAN — 220/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 19. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 03rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGN030024342023
Filing Number
220/2023
Filing Date
10-Oct-2023
Registration No
220/2023
Registration Date
10-Oct-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEPUTY ENGINEER SHRI DARSHANKUMAR MADHUKAR MAJMUDAR (UGVCL) DEHGAM (RULAR)
Adv. J T PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.KIRANSINH UDESINH CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: RCS 220/2023 Court Decision: The Primary Civil Court, Dahegam, partially allowed the plaintiff's (UGVCL) claim against the defendant (Kiransinh Udesinh Chauhan). The court decreed that the defendant must pay Rs. 12,104.39 in electricity bill arrears along with 6% annual interest from the bill date until full payment, plus court costs to be recovered from the defendant. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant had unlawfully consumed electricity (stealing 440 kilowatts detected during an inspection), failed to pay the issued bill despite legal notice, and provided no valid defense to dispute the debt. The defendant's absence during proceedings and failure to contest the plaintiff's documentary evidence resulted in judgment against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
17-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
05-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
08-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
17-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
06-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
09-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
11-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
21-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
25-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
20-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
24-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
13-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
12-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
08-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
20-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
27-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
03-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
30-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
29-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
10-Jun-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
01-Apr-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
19-Feb-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
15-Jan-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
04-Dec-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
12-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 220/2023
Case Summary: RCS 220/2023 Court Decision: The Primary Civil Court, Dahegam, partially allowed the plaintiff's (UGVCL) claim against the defendant (Kiransinh Udesinh Chauhan). The court decreed that the defendant must pay Rs. 12,104.39 in electricity bill arrears along with 6% annual interest from the bill date until full payment, plus court costs to be recovered from the defendant. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant had unlawfully consumed electricity (stealing 440 kilowatts detected during an inspection), failed to pay the issued bill despite legal notice, and provided no valid defense to dispute the debt. The defendant's absence during proceedings and failure to contest the plaintiff's documentary evidence resulted in judgment against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts