Government of Gujarat vs SHAILESHSINH MANGALSINH ZALA Advocate - M K KHATRI — 1282/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGN030020332024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1282/2024

Filing Date

02-12-2024

Registration No

1282/2024

Registration Date

02-12-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM

Judge

2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11216012240152

Police Station

RAKHIYAL POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279,337,338,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 177,183,184,187,181(3)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SHAILESHSINH MANGALSINH ZALA Advocate - M K KHATRI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

28-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

17-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Judgment Summary Case: C.C.No. 1282 of 2024, Dahegam Judicial Magistrate Court (Gujarat) Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Shailendrasinh Mangalsinh Jhala, under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 183, 184, 187, 181(3). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly drove his motorcycle and caused an accident injuring the complainant's daughter. Key Reason: Witness testimonies were inconsistent and unreliable—the complainant did not witness the accident, and other witnesses contradicted the prosecution narrative regarding vehicle identification and accident circumstances, creating insufficient grounds for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary Case: C.C.No. 1282 of 2024, Dahegam Judicial Magistrate Court (Gujarat) Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Shailendrasinh Mangalsinh Jhala, under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 183, 184, 187, 181(3). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly drove his motorcycle and caused an accident injuring the complainant's daughter. Key Reason: Witness testimonies were inconsistent and unreliable—the complainant did not witness the accident, and other witnesses contradicted the prosecution narrative regarding vehicle identification and accident circumstances, creating insufficient grounds for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case