PUNAMJI GORDHANJI THAKOR vs BHIKHAJI VAGHAJI THAKOR Advocate - P N VYAS — 145/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38,34. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJGN030018242023

Filing Number

145/2023

Filing Date

05-Aug-2023

Registration No

145/2023

Registration Date

05-Aug-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUNAMJI GORDHANJI THAKOR

    Adv. J J SHAH

  2. 2.ALKABEN GORDHANJI THAKOR

    Adv. J J SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHIKHAJI VAGHAJI THAKOR Advocate - P N VYAS

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  6. 13-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  7. 01-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  8. 21-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  9. 09-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  10. 21-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  11. 17-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  12. 03-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  13. 30-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  14. 18-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  15. 23-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  16. 27-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  17. 09-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  18. 30-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  19. 19-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  20. 13-Feb-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  21. 09-Jan-2024

    Order

    Summary The petition was dismissed. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish their case for the relief sought regarding agricultural land ownership shares and the validity of a registered Release Deed. The court found the registered deed presumptively genuine under Indian law and rejected the plaintiffs' arguments based on lack of proper evidence and conflicting claims. The court also dismissed their prayers for monetary compensation and other reliefs, finding them legally untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  22. 09-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  23. 08-Jan-2024

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  24. 11-Dec-2023

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  25. 28-Nov-2023

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  26. 30-Oct-2023

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  27. 25-Sep-2023

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  28. 22-Sep-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  29. 12-Sep-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  30. 01-Sep-2023

    For Rejoinder

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  31. 31-Aug-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  32. 22-Aug-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  33. 18-Aug-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  34. 09-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 05-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 145/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition was dismissed. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish their case for the relief sought regarding agricultural land ownership shares and the validity of a registered Release Deed. The court found the registered deed presumptively genuine under Indian law and rejected the plaintiffs' arguments based on lack of proper evidence and conflicting claims. The court also dismissed their prayers for monetary compensation and other reliefs, finding them legally untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case