PUNAMJI GORDHANJI THAKOR vs BHIKHAJI VAGHAJI THAKOR Advocate - P N VYAS — 145/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38,34,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGN030018242023
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
145/2023
Filing Date
05-08-2023
Registration No
145/2023
Registration Date
05-08-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUNAMJI GORDHANJI THAKOR
Adv. J J SHAH
ALKABEN GORDHANJI THAKOR
Adv. J J SHAH
Respondent(s)
BHIKHAJI VAGHAJI THAKOR Advocate - P N VYAS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 19-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 08-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 13-10-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition was dismissed. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish their case for the relief sought regarding agricultural land ownership shares and the validity of a registered Release Deed. The court found the registered deed presumptively genuine under Indian law and rejected the plaintiffs' arguments based on lack of proper evidence and conflicting claims. The court also dismissed their prayers for monetary compensation and other reliefs, finding them legally untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition was dismissed. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish their case for the relief sought regarding agricultural land ownership shares and the validity of a registered Release Deed. The court found the registered deed presumptively genuine under Indian law and rejected the plaintiffs' arguments based on lack of proper evidence and conflicting claims. The court also dismissed their prayers for monetary compensation and other reliefs, finding them legally untenable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts