DAMINIBEN W/O VIMALKUMAR MADHUSUDANBHAI TRIVEDI VIDHAVA vs BHARATIBEN MADHUSUDANBHAI TRIVEDI Advocate - G D RAO — 133/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGN030013112024
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
133/2024
Filing Date
09-08-2024
Registration No
133/2024
Registration Date
09-08-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DAMINIBEN W/O VIMALKUMAR MADHUSUDANBHAI TRIVEDI VIDHAVA
Adv. G H PARMAR
Respondent(s)
BHARATIBEN MADHUSUDANBHAI TRIVEDI Advocate - G D RAO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 06-04-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION | |
| 16-02-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION | |
| 05-01-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Order - R.C.S.NO. 133/2024 The petition filed by the wife (plaintiff) against her husband's family regarding inheritance rights to a disputed property has been partially allowed. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from transferring, selling, mortgaging, or otherwise alienating the property, while directing the defendant not to prevent the plaintiff's access to the property. The court also directed that the final order be decided on merits after complete hearing, with costs reserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Order - R.C.S.NO. 133/2024 The petition filed by the wife (plaintiff) against her husband's family regarding inheritance rights to a disputed property has been partially allowed. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from transferring, selling, mortgaging, or otherwise alienating the property, while directing the defendant not to prevent the plaintiff's access to the property. The court also directed that the final order be decided on merits after complete hearing, with costs reserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts