DAMINIBEN W/O VIMALKUMAR MADHUSUDANBHAI TRIVEDI VIDHAVA vs BHARATIBEN MADHUSUDANBHAI TRIVEDI Advocate - G D RAO — 133/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJGN030013112024

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

133/2024

Filing Date

09-08-2024

Registration No

133/2024

Registration Date

09-08-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34,38,
IA/1/2024 Classification : INTERIM APPLICATION Section DAMINIBEN W/O VIMALKUMAR MADHUSUDANBHAI TRIVEDI VIDHAVABHARATIBEN MADHUSUDANBHAI TRIVEDI

Petitioner(s)

DAMINIBEN W/O VIMALKUMAR MADHUSUDANBHAI TRIVEDI VIDHAVA

Adv. G H PARMAR

Respondent(s)

BHARATIBEN MADHUSUDANBHAI TRIVEDI Advocate - G D RAO

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

08-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

06-04-2026

ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION

09-03-2026

ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION

16-02-2026

ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION

05-01-2026

ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION

Interim Orders

08-04-2026
ORDER
08-04-2026
ORDER

Summary of Court Order - R.C.S.NO. 133/2024 The petition filed by the wife (plaintiff) against her husband's family regarding inheritance rights to a disputed property has been partially allowed. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from transferring, selling, mortgaging, or otherwise alienating the property, while directing the defendant not to prevent the plaintiff's access to the property. The court also directed that the final order be decided on merits after complete hearing, with costs reserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Order - R.C.S.NO. 133/2024 The petition filed by the wife (plaintiff) against her husband's family regarding inheritance rights to a disputed property has been partially allowed. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from transferring, selling, mortgaging, or otherwise alienating the property, while directing the defendant not to prevent the plaintiff's access to the property. The court also directed that the final order be decided on merits after complete hearing, with costs reserved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case