Government of Gujarat vs SONIYA W/O SANJAY RAJENDRAKUMAR TULI Advocate - H I SHAH — 844/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGN030012972024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

844/2024

Filing Date

06-08-2024

Registration No

844/2024

Registration Date

06-08-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM

Judge

2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11216012240051

Police Station

RAKHIYAL POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 406,420,114,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SONIYA W/O SANJAY RAJENDRAKUMAR TULI Advocate - H I SHAH

SANJAY S/O RAJENDRAKUMAR TULI

Adv. H I SHAH

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

24-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

26-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The Additional JMFC (Dahegam) court acquitted both accused persons (Soniya and Sanjay Rajendrakumar Tuli) of criminal charges for breach of trust and cheating under IPC sections 406, 420, and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged fraudulent scheme involving unauthorized dealer appointments and non-payment of dues worth Rs. 22,40,044. The prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional JMFC (Dahegam) court acquitted both accused persons (Soniya and Sanjay Rajendrakumar Tuli) of criminal charges for breach of trust and cheating under IPC sections 406, 420, and 114, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged fraudulent scheme involving unauthorized dealer appointments and non-payment of dues worth Rs. 22,40,044. The prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case