RAJESHBHAI KESHABHAI PATEL vs LABHSANKAR @ VINODBHAI SOMNATH VYAS — 134/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 35,39. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGN030011082022
Filing Number
134/2022
Filing Date
01-Sep-2022
Registration No
134/2022
Registration Date
01-Sep-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESHBHAI KESHABHAI PATEL
Adv. M S ACHARYA
-
2.HEMEDNRA KESHABHAI PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.LABHSANKAR @ VINODBHAI SOMNATH VYAS
-
2.NAYNABEN D/O SOMANATH VYAS
-
3.RAMILABEN @ SURYABAVLA D/O SOMNATH VYAS
-
4.BEBIBEN @ MADHAVIBEN D/O SOMNATH VYAS
-
5.JATIN MAHESHBHAI VYAS
-
6.KEYUR NARENDRA PANDYA
-
7.BHAGIRATHSINH RANVIRSINH JADEJA
-
8.PATEL PARTH ARVINDBHAI
-
9.RAVAL DILIPKUMAR VASUDEVBHAI
-
10.PARSHOTTAM DHANJIBHAI PATEL
-
11.DIPEN NARESHBHAI PATEL
-
12.ISHWARBHAI MAVJIBHAI PATEL
-
13.LT DAHYABHAI MARGHABHAI HEIRS(Legal Heir)
Case History
-
30-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
17-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
27-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
16-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
28-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
23-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
19-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
22-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
17-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
22-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
11-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
28-Jan-2025
OrderView PDF
-
28-Jan-2025
OrderView PDF
-
28-Jan-2025
OrderView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: R.C.S. NO. 134/2022 The petition seeking to declare the petitioners as owners of agricultural land in Kodarali village, Dabhegam, Gandhinagar district was dismissed. The court found that while the petitioners' ancestors had cultivated the land for decades and the original owners had sold it to them, the petitioners failed to prove legal ownership through proper registered sale deeds. The court noted that one respondent obtained a registered sale deed in 1982, while the petitioners' claims lacked documentary evidence despite possessing the land. The court rejected the petition as the petitioners could not establish their title to the disputed agricultural property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Jan-2025
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
07-Jan-2025
Order On Injuction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
10-Dec-2024
Order On Injuction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
25-Nov-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
11-Nov-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
08-Oct-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
03-Sep-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
16-Jul-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
11-Jun-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
02-Apr-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
27-Feb-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
29-Jan-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
18-Dec-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
23-Oct-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
11-Sep-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
31-Jul-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
26-Jun-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
17-Apr-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
21-Feb-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
09-Jan-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
06-Dec-2022
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
11-Oct-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 134/2022
CASE SUMMARY: R.C.S. NO. 134/2022 The petition seeking to declare the petitioners as owners of agricultural land in Kodarali village, Dabhegam, Gandhinagar district was dismissed. The court found that while the petitioners' ancestors had cultivated the land for decades and the original owners had sold it to them, the petitioners failed to prove legal ownership through proper registered sale deeds. The court noted that one respondent obtained a registered sale deed in 1982, while the petitioners' claims lacked documentary evidence despite possessing the land. The court rejected the petition as the petitioners could not establish their title to the disputed agricultural property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts