JYOTIBEN RUPESHKUMAR AMIN vs MAHESHBHAI NARSINHBHAI AMIN Advocate - A K MANSURI — 128/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 35,39. Status: Hearing On Injunction Application. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

Hearing On Injunction Application Next hearing 04-May-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJGN030010862022

Filing Number

128/2022

Filing Date

18-Aug-2022

Registration No

128/2022

Registration Date

18-Aug-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 35,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JYOTIBEN RUPESHKUMAR AMIN

    Adv. D J RAJGOR

  2. 2.JYOTIBEN RUPESHKUMAR AMIN POA HOLDER YESHABEN RUPESHKUMAR AMIN

  3. 3.PURTIBEN RUPESHKUMAR AMIN

  4. 4.ABHISHEK RUPESHKUMAR AMIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHBHAI NARSINHBHAI AMIN Advocate - A K MANSURI

Case History

  1. 04-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  3. 12-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  4. 24-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  5. 15-Sep-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  6. 28-Jul-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  7. 01-Jul-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  8. 06-May-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  9. 08-Apr-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  10. 25-Feb-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  11. 07-Jan-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  12. 19-Nov-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  13. 01-Oct-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  14. 20-Aug-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  15. 16-Jul-2024

    OrderView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure was rejected. The court held that the plaint discloses a sufficient cause of action, as the plaintiffs clearly stated that the cause of action arose when they issued a public notice seeking a title clearance certificate and the defendant filed objections in response. The court also distinguished the case from cited Supreme Court precedents involving registered documents, noting that the partition deed under challenge is unregistered, and therefore limitation arguments based on those judgments were inapplicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 16-Jul-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  17. 18-Jun-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  18. 23-Apr-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  19. 16-Mar-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  20. 17-Feb-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  21. 20-Jan-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  22. 15-Dec-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  23. 10-Nov-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  24. 17-Oct-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  25. 12-Sep-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  26. 01-Aug-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  27. 04-Jul-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  28. 06-Jun-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  29. 20-Mar-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  30. 13-Feb-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  31. 21-Jan-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  32. 26-Dec-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  33. 07-Nov-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  34. 04-Oct-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  35. 27-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 18-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 128/2022

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure was rejected. The court held that the plaint discloses a sufficient cause of action, as the plaintiffs clearly stated that the cause of action arose when they issued a public notice seeking a title clearance certificate and the defendant filed objections in response. The court also distinguished the case from cited Supreme Court precedents involving registered documents, noting that the partition deed under challenge is unregistered, and therefore limitation arguments based on those judgments were inapplicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case