KALUSINH JAVANSINH ZALA vs MAIYAT BHAGABHAI KAHYABHAI VARASDAR BHARATBHAI BHAGABHAI PATEL Advocate - M S PATEL — 102/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGN030010002024
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
102/2024
Filing Date
14-06-2024
Registration No
102/2024
Registration Date
14-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KALUSINH JAVANSINH ZALA
Adv. A A PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
MAIYAT BHAGABHAI KAHYABHAI VARASDAR BHARATBHAI BHAGABHAI PATEL Advocate - M S PATEL
MANIBEN SHAMALBHAI PATEL
NANDKISHOR SHAMALBHAI PATEL
PREMILABEN D/O SHAMALBHAI PATEL
CHANDRIKABEN D/O SHAMALBHAI PATEL
KANAIYALAL SHAMALBHAI PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 02-01-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 09-10-2025 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 10-07-2025 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 08-05-2025 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
The defendant's Civil Procedure Code Order-7, Rule 11(D) revision petition is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff has been in possession of the disputed agricultural land since 1986 and is entitled to claim ownership despite a 40-year delay in filing the suit, as the defendants failed to provide evidence of their superior claim to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The defendant's Civil Procedure Code Order-7, Rule 11(D) revision petition is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff has been in possession of the disputed agricultural land since 1986 and is entitled to claim ownership despite a 40-year delay in filing the suit, as the defendants failed to provide evidence of their superior claim to the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts