AYUBKHAN RAHIMKHAN PATHAN vs BISMILLAKHAN KARIMKHAN PATHAN Advocate - D K SHAH — 29/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 35,39. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 05-Aug-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJGN030004292023

Filing Number

29/2023

Filing Date

07-Feb-2023

Registration No

29/2023

Registration Date

07-Feb-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 35,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AYUBKHAN RAHIMKHAN PATHAN

    Adv. K B MEHTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BISMILLAKHAN KARIMKHAN PATHAN Advocate - D K SHAH

  2. 2.SALIMKHAN CHANDKHAN

  3. 3.RAJIYABANU CHADKHAN

  4. 4.SALMABANU CHADKHAN

  5. 5.ALIYARKHAN CHADKHAN

  6. 6.SAYRABANU CHANDKHAN

  7. 7.RUSTAMKHAN CHANDKHAN

  8. 8.MUMTAJBANU CHADKHAN

Case History

  1. 05-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  5. 02-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  6. 14-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  7. 09-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  8. 05-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  9. 24-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  10. 01-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  11. 25-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  12. 18-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  13. 07-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  14. 19-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  15. 24-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  16. 13-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  17. 02-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  18. 18-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  19. 19-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  20. 15-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  21. 09-Apr-2024

    Order

    Case Summary: R.C.S. NO. 29/2023 Court Order Outcome: The petition was DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioner's plea for a mandatory injunction and declined to grant relief sought against the respondents regarding disputed land ownership and sale transactions. Key Issue: The petitioner (Ayubkhan) claimed ownership rights to agricultural land in Gandhinagar district and sought to prevent respondents from transferring or interfering with the property. However, the court found that the petitioner's claim was based on an unregistered sale agreement from 2003, which does not constitute valid legal transfer of immovable property under the Transfer of Property Act. Decision Rationale: The court held that immovable property can only be transferred through a registered deed of conveyance, not through agreements to sell or unregistered documents. Since the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case with proper registered documentation and the respondents held valid registered title, the petition lacked merit and was accordingly dismissed with costs imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  22. 09-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  23. 26-Mar-2024

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  24. 28-Feb-2024

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  25. 29-Jan-2024

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  26. 01-Jan-2024

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  27. 04-Dec-2023

    For Rejoinder

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  28. 16-Oct-2023

    For Rejoinder

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  29. 11-Sep-2023

    For Rejoinder

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  30. 07-Aug-2023

    For Rejoinder

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  31. 31-Jul-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  32. 26-Jun-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  33. 17-Apr-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  34. 20-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 07-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. NO. 29/2023 Court Order Outcome: The petition was DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioner's plea for a mandatory injunction and declined to grant relief sought against the respondents regarding disputed land ownership and sale transactions. Key Issue: The petitioner (Ayubkhan) claimed ownership rights to agricultural land in Gandhinagar district and sought to prevent respondents from transferring or interfering with the property. However, the court found that the petitioner's claim was based on an unregistered sale agreement from 2003, which does not constitute valid legal transfer of immovable property under the Transfer of Property Act. Decision Rationale: The court held that immovable property can only be transferred through a registered deed of conveyance, not through agreements to sell or unregistered documents. Since the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case with proper registered documentation and the respondents held valid registered title, the petition lacked merit and was accordingly dismissed with costs imposed on the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case