JITUBHAI RAMABHAI PRAJAPATI vs DABHI SIDDHARAJSINH BALVANTSINH Advocate - S C VAGHELA — 451/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJGN010047032025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

453/2025

Filing Date

20-12-2025

Registration No

451/2025

Registration Date

20-12-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 374,
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

JITUBHAI RAMABHAI PRAJAPATI

Adv. K N CHAVDA

Respondent(s)

DABHI SIDDHARAJSINH BALVANTSINH Advocate - S C VAGHELA

Government of Gujarat

Adv. DGP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

11-02-2026

FOR R&P

20-01-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted the appellant of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act after the complainant and accused reached an amicable settlement regarding the disputed cheque during the National Lok-Adalat. The court quashed the original conviction and one-year imprisonment sentence, relying on Section 147 of the N.I. Act which permits compounding of offences, and waived all costs considering the parties' positive settlement and the accused's financial condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted the appellant of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act after the complainant and accused reached an amicable settlement regarding the disputed cheque during the National Lok-Adalat. The court quashed the original conviction and one-year imprisonment sentence, relying on Section 147 of the N.I. Act which permits compounding of offences, and waived all costs considering the parties' positive settlement and the accused's financial condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case