JITUBHAI RAMABHAI PRAJAPATI vs DABHI SIDDHARAJSINH BALVANTSINH Advocate - S C VAGHELA — 451/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJGN010047032025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
453/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
451/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR
Judge
2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JITUBHAI RAMABHAI PRAJAPATI
Adv. K N CHAVDA
Respondent(s)
DABHI SIDDHARAJSINH BALVANTSINH Advocate - S C VAGHELA
Government of Gujarat
Adv. DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FOR R&P
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 11-02-2026 | FOR R&P | |
| 20-01-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted the appellant of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act after the complainant and accused reached an amicable settlement regarding the disputed cheque during the National Lok-Adalat. The court quashed the original conviction and one-year imprisonment sentence, relying on Section 147 of the N.I. Act which permits compounding of offences, and waived all costs considering the parties' positive settlement and the accused's financial condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted the appellant of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act after the complainant and accused reached an amicable settlement regarding the disputed cheque during the National Lok-Adalat. The court quashed the original conviction and one-year imprisonment sentence, relying on Section 147 of the N.I. Act which permits compounding of offences, and waived all costs considering the parties' positive settlement and the accused's financial condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts