KIRANKUMAR ISHVARBHAI PARMAR vs BHARATSINH PRATAPSINH CHAVDA Advocate - Y H SONI — 414/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJGN010042822025

Case disposed

Filing Number

416/2025

Filing Date

18-11-2025

Registration No

414/2025

Registration Date

18-11-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

3-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

KIRANKUMAR ISHVARBHAI PARMAR

Adv. A B RATHOD

Respondent(s)

BHARATSINH PRATAPSINH CHAVDA Advocate - Y H SONI

Government of Gujarat

Adv. DGP

Hearing History

Judge: 3-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

02-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

17-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

02-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Cri. Appeal No. 414/2025 The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge at Gandhinagar allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted Kirankumar Ishvarbhai Parmar of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The appellant had been convicted by the trial court to one year imprisonment and ordered to pay 1.5 times the cheque amount. However, during the appeal hearing, the appellant and original complainant (Bharatsinh Pratapsinh Chavda) reached an amicable settlement and submitted a joint compromise petition. Relying on Section 147 of the NI Act (which permits compounding of offences at any stage) and Supreme Court precedent, the court quashed the conviction and acquitted the appellant, waiving costs in light of the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri. Appeal No. 414/2025 The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge at Gandhinagar allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted Kirankumar Ishvarbhai Parmar of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The appellant had been convicted by the trial court to one year imprisonment and ordered to pay 1.5 times the cheque amount. However, during the appeal hearing, the appellant and original complainant (Bharatsinh Pratapsinh Chavda) reached an amicable settlement and submitted a joint compromise petition. Relying on Section 147 of the NI Act (which permits compounding of offences at any stage) and Supreme Court precedent, the court quashed the conviction and acquitted the appellant, waiving costs in light of the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case