KIRANKUMAR ISHVARBHAI PARMAR vs BHARATSINH PRATAPSINH CHAVDA Advocate - Y H SONI — 414/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJGN010042822025
Filing Number
416/2025
Filing Date
18-11-2025
Registration No
414/2025
Registration Date
18-11-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR
Judge
3-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KIRANKUMAR ISHVARBHAI PARMAR
Adv. A B RATHOD
Respondent(s)
BHARATSINH PRATAPSINH CHAVDA Advocate - Y H SONI
Government of Gujarat
Adv. DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 02-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 17-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 02-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri. Appeal No. 414/2025 The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge at Gandhinagar allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted Kirankumar Ishvarbhai Parmar of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The appellant had been convicted by the trial court to one year imprisonment and ordered to pay 1.5 times the cheque amount. However, during the appeal hearing, the appellant and original complainant (Bharatsinh Pratapsinh Chavda) reached an amicable settlement and submitted a joint compromise petition. Relying on Section 147 of the NI Act (which permits compounding of offences at any stage) and Supreme Court precedent, the court quashed the conviction and acquitted the appellant, waiving costs in light of the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri. Appeal No. 414/2025 The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge at Gandhinagar allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted Kirankumar Ishvarbhai Parmar of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The appellant had been convicted by the trial court to one year imprisonment and ordered to pay 1.5 times the cheque amount. However, during the appeal hearing, the appellant and original complainant (Bharatsinh Pratapsinh Chavda) reached an amicable settlement and submitted a joint compromise petition. Relying on Section 147 of the NI Act (which permits compounding of offences at any stage) and Supreme Court precedent, the court quashed the conviction and acquitted the appellant, waiving costs in light of the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts