PATEL JAYANTIBHAI SHAMAJIBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - S S PANDYA — 384/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJGN010039362025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

387/2025

Filing Date

16-10-2025

Registration No

384/2025

Registration Date

16-10-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 374,
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

PATEL JAYANTIBHAI SHAMAJIBHAI

Adv. H G PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - S S PANDYA

CHAUHAN PRAVINSINH ARJUNSINH

Adv. A K MANSURI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

11-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

21-01-2026

URGENT HEARING

16-12-2025

FOR R&P

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Sessions Judge at Gandhinagar allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted the appellant from charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (bounced cheque case) after both parties reached an out-of-court settlement. The court quashed the earlier conviction order dated 23.09.2025, permitted compounding of the offence under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and directed that any deposited amount be returned to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge at Gandhinagar allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted the appellant from charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (bounced cheque case) after both parties reached an out-of-court settlement. The court quashed the earlier conviction order dated 23.09.2025, permitted compounding of the offence under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and directed that any deposited amount be returned to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case