CHAUHAN GUNVANTSINH CHHATRASINH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 1459/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJGN010038032025
Filing Number
1462/2025
Filing Date
09-10-2025
Registration No
1459/2025
Registration Date
09-10-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR
Judge
5-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11216005250017
Police Station
DAHEGAM POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAUHAN GUNVANTSINH CHHATRASINH
Adv. S H MALEK
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 5-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 05-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Chauhan Gunvantsinh Chhatrasinh v. Government of Gujarat (1459/2025) The court granted the applicant's request for custody of seized gold ornaments (23.200g gold set and 8.970g earrings) and Rs. 1,00,000 in cash. The items were forfeited by the accused's parents during a POCSO investigation, but the victim and her father confirmed the items belonged to the applicant. The court ordered release upon furnishing 1.5x bond value and imposed conditions requiring photographic documentation and production of items as needed for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Chauhan Gunvantsinh Chhatrasinh v. Government of Gujarat (1459/2025) The court granted the applicant's request for custody of seized gold ornaments (23.200g gold set and 8.970g earrings) and Rs. 1,00,000 in cash. The items were forfeited by the accused's parents during a POCSO investigation, but the victim and her father confirmed the items belonged to the applicant. The court ordered release upon furnishing 1.5x bond value and imposed conditions requiring photographic documentation and production of items as needed for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts