VILASBEN HIMATSINH CHAUHAN HEIRS OF LATE AJAYSINH HIMATSINH CHAUHAN vs LALABHAI DAHYABHAI DABHI Advocate - B J DABHI — 11/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21. Status: Process Of Execution. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Process Of Execution Next hearing 30-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: GJGN010031512024

Filing Number

11/2024

Filing Date

07-Aug-2024

Registration No

11/2024

Registration Date

07-Aug-2024

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

4-5th Addl District Judge

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VILASBEN HIMATSINH CHAUHAN HEIRS OF LATE AJAYSINH HIMATSINH CHAUHAN

    Adv. B R MISTRY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALABHAI DAHYABHAI DABHI Advocate - B J DABHI

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-May-2026

    Process Of Execution

    5th Addl District Judge

  3. 05-May-2026

    Process Of Execution

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Process Of Execution

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Process Of Execution

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Process Of Execution

    5th Addl District Judge

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Process Of Execution

    5th Addl District Judge

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Process Of Execution

    5th Addl District Judge

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    Process Of Execution

    5th Addl District Judge

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    Restored

    5th Addl District Judge

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    Process Of Execution

    5th Addl District Judge

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    Process Of Execution

    5th Addl District Judge

  13. 22-Aug-2025

    Order

    Case Summary (MACEX No. 11/2024) The case was filed in 2024 and involved a miscellaneous application (MACEX). The court found that the respondent (defendant) failed to appear in court despite multiple notices and showed no genuine interest in pursuing the case or executing the warrant issued against them. The court dismissed the case in absentia under CPC Order-21, Rule-105, as the respondent's continued non-appearance and lack of engagement demonstrated no reasonable basis to continue proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 22-Aug-2025

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  15. 25-Jul-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    6th Addl District Judge

  16. 11-Jul-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    6th Addl District Judge

  17. 26-Jun-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    6th Addl District Judge

  18. 24-Apr-2025

    Warrant Of Attachment

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  19. 25-Mar-2025

    Process Of Execution

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  20. 24-Feb-2025

    Process Of Execution

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  21. 20-Jan-2025

    Process Of Execution

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  22. 10-Dec-2024

    Process Of Execution

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  23. 12-Nov-2024

    Process Of Execution

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  24. 18-Oct-2024

    Process Of Execution

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  25. 20-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 07-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (MACEX No. 11/2024) The case was filed in 2024 and involved a miscellaneous application (MACEX). The court found that the respondent (defendant) failed to appear in court despite multiple notices and showed no genuine interest in pursuing the case or executing the warrant issued against them. The court dismissed the case in absentia under CPC Order-21, Rule-105, as the respondent's continued non-appearance and lack of engagement demonstrated no reasonable basis to continue proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case