Government of Gujarat vs GULAMNABI MUSTUFAMIYA ALIAS MUSABHAI MALEK Advocate - M J DIWAN — 63/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,323,504,506(2),143,147,148,149. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJGN010027682024

Filing Number

63/2024

Filing Date

12-Jul-2024

Registration No

63/2024

Registration Date

12-Jul-2024

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

3-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11216012240063

Police Station

RAKHIYAL POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 307,323,504,506(2),143,147,148,149

Police Act, 1949 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

1.Government of Gujarat

Adv. P D VYAS

Respondent(s)

1.GULAMNABI MUSTUFAMIYA ALIAS MUSABHAI MALEK Advocate - M J DIWAN
2.ASHFAK GULAMNABI MALEK

Adv. M J DIWAN
3.MOHAMMAD SAHJAD GULAMNABI MALEK

Adv. M J DIWAN
4.SAMIRMIYA S/O GULABMIYA AHEMADMIYA MALEK

Adv. M J DIWAN

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
13-Mar-2026

JudegementView PDF

Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar, convicted four accused persons under Indian Penal Code sections 307, 323, 504, 506(2), 143, 147, 148, 149, and IPC section 135 for a violent incident occurring on March 10, 2024, involving a religious procession where the victim was assaulted by a mob with weapons. The court found the prosecution's case established through witness testimony and medical evidence despite the accused's defense of alibi and alternative narratives. The convicted individuals were sentenced to imprisonment and directed to pay compensation to the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
13-Mar-2026

Disposed

3rd Addl District Judge
09-Mar-2026

Judgement

3rd Addl District Judge
02-Mar-2026

Further Statement

3rd Addl District Judge
25-Feb-2026

Evidence Of Prosecution

3rd Addl District Judge
23-Feb-2026

Evidence Of Prosecution

3rd Addl District Judge
16-Feb-2026

Evidence Of Prosecution

3rd Addl District Judge
22-Jan-2026

Evidence Of Prosecution

3rd Addl District Judge
08-Jan-2026

Evidence Of Prosecution

3rd Addl District Judge
10-Dec-2025

Evidence Of Prosecution

3rd Addl District Judge
18-Nov-2025

Evidence Of Prosecution

3rd Addl District Judge
14-Oct-2025

Framing Of Charge/Plea

3rd Addl District Judge
23-Sep-2025

Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

3rd Addl District Judge
01-Sep-2025

Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

3rd Addl District Judge
11-Aug-2025

Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

3rd Addl District Judge
17-Jul-2025

Process To Accused

3rd Addl District Judge
13-Jun-2025

Process To Accused

Principal District & Sessions Judge
07-May-2025

Process To Accused

Principal District & Sessions Judge
05-Apr-2025

Process To Accused

Principal District & Sessions Judge
28-Feb-2025

Process To Accused

Principal District & Sessions Judge
29-Jan-2025

Process To Accused

Principal District & Sessions Judge
24-Dec-2024

Process To Accused

Principal District & Sessions Judge
28-Nov-2024

Process To Accused

Principal District & Sessions Judge
21-Oct-2024

Process To Accused

Principal District & Sessions Judge
11-Sep-2024

Process To Accused

Principal District & Sessions Judge
21-Aug-2024

Process To Accused

Principal District & Sessions Judge
12-Jul-2024

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
12-Jul-2024

Case filed

Registration No. 63/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar, convicted four accused persons under Indian Penal Code sections 307, 323, 504, 506(2), 143, 147, 148, 149, and IPC section 135 for a violent incident occurring on March 10, 2024, involving a religious procession where the victim was assaulted by a mob with weapons. The court found the prosecution's case established through witness testimony and medical evidence despite the accused's defense of alibi and alternative narratives. The convicted individuals were sentenced to imprisonment and directed to pay compensation to the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.