ANITA YADAV vs SUMITKUMAR SURSHKUMAR YADAV Advocate - S K PATEL — 1054/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2),. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJGN010027142025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1058/2025
Filing Date
21-07-2025
Registration No
1054/2025
Registration Date
21-07-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANITA YADAV
Respondent(s)
SUMITKUMAR SURSHKUMAR YADAV Advocate - S K PATEL
Government of Gujarat
Adv. S S PANDYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 11-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 22-01-2026 | HEARING | |
| 13-01-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Judge at Gandhinagar dismissed the application for cancellation of bail filed against Sumitkumar Sureshkumar Yadav. Although the applicant alleged the accused breached bail conditions by not appearing regularly before the trial court, the court found that after the bail cancellation application was filed, the accused appeared before the court, gave assurance of regular appearance, and paid the court-ordered cost of Rs. 25,000 to the applicant, making further action unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Judge at Gandhinagar dismissed the application for cancellation of bail filed against Sumitkumar Sureshkumar Yadav. Although the applicant alleged the accused breached bail conditions by not appearing regularly before the trial court, the court found that after the bail cancellation application was filed, the accused appeared before the court, gave assurance of regular appearance, and paid the court-ordered cost of Rs. 25,000 to the applicant, making further action unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts