ANITA YADAV vs SUMITKUMAR SURSHKUMAR YADAV Advocate - S K PATEL — 1054/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2),. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 06th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJGN010027142025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1058/2025

Filing Date

21-07-2025

Registration No

1054/2025

Registration Date

21-07-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 439(2),
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 354A(1)(iii),354,341,377,114,498A,406,
DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, 1961 Section 3,4,

Petitioner(s)

ANITA YADAV

Respondent(s)

SUMITKUMAR SURSHKUMAR YADAV Advocate - S K PATEL

Government of Gujarat

Adv. S S PANDYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

06-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

ORDER

11-02-2026

HEARING

22-01-2026

HEARING

13-01-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Sessions Judge at Gandhinagar dismissed the application for cancellation of bail filed against Sumitkumar Sureshkumar Yadav. Although the applicant alleged the accused breached bail conditions by not appearing regularly before the trial court, the court found that after the bail cancellation application was filed, the accused appeared before the court, gave assurance of regular appearance, and paid the court-ordered cost of Rs. 25,000 to the applicant, making further action unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge at Gandhinagar dismissed the application for cancellation of bail filed against Sumitkumar Sureshkumar Yadav. Although the applicant alleged the accused breached bail conditions by not appearing regularly before the trial court, the court found that after the bail cancellation application was filed, the accused appeared before the court, gave assurance of regular appearance, and paid the court-ordered cost of Rs. 25,000 to the applicant, making further action unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case